Literature DB >> 11145777

Achieving graphical excellence: suggestions and methods for creating high-quality visual displays of experimental data.

D L Schriger1, R J Cooper.   

Abstract

Graphics are an important means of communicating experimental data and results. There is evidence, however, that many of the graphics printed in scientific journals contain errors, redundancies, and lack clarity. Perhaps more important, many graphics fail to portray data at an appropriate level of detail, presenting summary statistics rather than underlying distributions. We seek to aid investigators in the production of high-quality graphics that do their investigations justice by providing the reader with optimum access to the relevant aspects of the data. The depiction of by-subject data, the signification of pairing when present, and the use of symbolic dimensionality (graphing different symbols to identify relevant subgroups) and small multiples (the presentation of an array of similar graphics each depicting one group of subjects) to portray stratification are stressed. Step-by-step instructions for the construction of high-quality graphics are offered. We hope that authors will incorporate these suggestions when developing graphics to accompany their manuscripts and that this process will lead to improvements in the graphical literacy of scientific journals. We also hope that journal editors will keep these principles in mind when refereeing manuscripts submitted for peer review.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11145777     DOI: 10.1067/mem.2001.111570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  12 in total

1.  The quantity and quality of scientific graphs in pharmaceutical advertisements.

Authors:  Richelle J Cooper; David L Schriger; Roger C Wallace; Vladislav J Mikulich; Michael S Wilkes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Design and evaluation of a web-based interactive visualization system for lung transplant home monitoring data.

Authors:  David S Pieczkiewicz; Stanley M Finkelstein; Marshall I Hertz
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

Review 3.  How to interpret figures in reports of clinical trials.

Authors:  Stuart J Pocock; Thomas G Travison; Lisa M Wruck
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-05-24

4.  Implementation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and Its Association With Use of Computed Tomography Among Patients With Head Injury.

Authors:  Adam L Sharp; Brian Z Huang; Tania Tang; Ernest Shen; Edward R Melnick; Arjun K Venkatesh; Michael H Kanter; Michael K Gould
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  Physician Interpretation of Data of Uncertain Clinical Utility in Oncology Prescription Drug Promotion.

Authors:  Vanessa Boudewyns; Amie C O'Donoghue; Ryan S Paquin; Kathryn J Aikin; Kate Ferriola-Bruckenstein; Victoria M Scott
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-09-28

6.  The Evolution of Scientific Visualisations: A Case Study Approach to Big Data for Varied Audiences.

Authors:  Andrew J Lunn; Vivien Shaw; Isabelle C Winder
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

7.  Figures in clinical trial reports: current practice & scope for improvement.

Authors:  Stuart J Pocock; Thomas G Travison; Lisa M Wruck
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Is the relationship among outcome variables shown in randomized trials?

Authors:  David L Schriger; Richelle J Cooper; Ana Lopez-O'Sullivan; Carter Wystrach; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Hurdles of publication: to authors to overcome.

Authors:  Hafez Mohammadhassanzadeh; Roghayeh Ilghami
Journal:  Bioimpacts       Date:  2014-11-29

10.  Presentation of continuous outcomes in randomised trials: an observational study.

Authors:  David L Schriger; Dan F Savage; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-12-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.