Literature DB >> 11145762

Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with advanced heart failure: the Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation (MIRACLE).

W T Abraham1.   

Abstract

Up to 50% of patients with chronic systolic heart failure have interventricular conduction delays, such as left bundle branch block, that result in abnormal electrical depolarization of the heart. Prolonged QRS duration results in abnormal interventricular septal wall motion, decreased contractility, reduced diastolic filling time, and prolonged duration of mitral regurgitation, which places the failing heart at a significant mechanical disadvantage. Prolonged QRS duration has been associated with poor outcome in heart failure patients. Atrial-synchronized, biventricular pacing or cardiac resynchronization therapy optimizes atrial-ventricular delay, narrows QRS duration, and seems promising in the management of advanced heart failure patients. Initial studies show improved quality of life and functional capacity compared with baseline or with no pacing. These studies, however, were either uncontrolled or poorly controlled, unblinded or only single-blinded, and enrolled small numbers of patients. The Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation (MIRACLE) is a large, prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial designed to more definitively evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of cardiac resynchronization for heart failure. The study is being completed in 3 phases (an initial pilot phase, a pivotal phase, and an expansion phase), enrolling 500 patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and IV systolic heart failure and QRS durations of 130 ms or more. Prospectively defined primary end points for the pivotal phase include evaluation of safety (implant success rate, freedom from stimulator- and ventricular-lead-related complications) and effects on functional status (quality of life, NYHA class, 6-minute hall walk distance) at 6 months. A variety of secondary end points will further define the efficacy and mechanism(s) of action of cardiac resynchronization in heart failure. The pivotal phase of MIRACLE will conclude in January 2001.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11145762     DOI: 10.1054/jcaf.2000.20841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Fail        ISSN: 1071-9164            Impact factor:   5.712


  20 in total

Review 1.  Role of resynchronisation therapy and implantable cardioverter defibrillators in heart failure.

Authors:  S Ellery; L Williams; M Frenneaux
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 2.  Relationship of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator and chronic resynchronization therapy: the perfect marriage?

Authors:  David S Cannom; Morton Mower
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  MSCT labelling for pre-operative planning in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Kristell Rioual; Edurne Unanua; Soizic Laguitton; Mireille Garreau; Dominique Boulmier; Pascal Haigron; Christophe Leclercq; Jean-Louis Coatrieux
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 4.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy: a decade of experience and the dilemma of nonresponders.

Authors:  Leila Ganjehei; Mehdi Razavi; Ali Massumi
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2011

5.  Bifocal right ventricular pacing: an alternative way to achieve resynchronization when left ventricular lead insertion is unsuccessful.

Authors:  Skevos Sideris; Constantina Aggeli; Emmanouil Poulidakis; Kostas Gatzoulis; Ioannis Vlaseros; Katerina Avgeropoulou; Ioannis Felekos; Ilias Sotiropoulos; Christodoulos Stefanadis; Ioannis Kallikazaros
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Association Between a Prolonged PR Interval and Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Report From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  Daniel J Friedman; Haikun Bao; Erica S Spatz; Jeptha P Curtis; James P Daubert; Sana M Al-Khatib
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  Physiology of cardiac resynchronization.

Authors:  Usha Tedrow; Michael O Sweeney; William G Stevenson
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Biventricular pacing (cardiac resynchronization therapy): an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2005-09-01

9.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy in congestive heart failure: The state of the art and future perspectives.

Authors:  Lexin Wang
Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol       Date:  2002

10.  Comparing administration of questionnaires via the internet to pen-and-paper in patients with heart failure: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Robert C Wu; Kevin Thorpe; Heather Ross; Vaska Micevski; Christine Marquez; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.