Literature DB >> 11145306

The comet assay with multiple mouse organs: comparison of comet assay results and carcinogenicity with 208 chemicals selected from the IARC monographs and U.S. NTP Carcinogenicity Database.

Y F Sasaki1, K Sekihashi, F Izumiyama, E Nishidate, A Saga, K Ishida, S Tsuda.   

Abstract

The comet assay is a microgel electrophoresis technique for detecting DNA damage at the level of the single cell. When this technique is applied to detect genotoxicity in experimental animals, the most important advantage is that DNA lesions can be measured in any organ, regardless of the extent of mitotic activity. The purpose of this article is to summarize the in vivo genotoxicity in eight organs of the mouse of 208 chemicals selected from International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Groups 1, 2A, 2B, 3, and 4, and from the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) Carcinogenicity Database, and to discuss the utility of the comet assay in genetic toxicology. Alkylating agents, amides, aromatic amines, azo compounds, cyclic nitro compounds, hydrazines, halides having reactive halogens, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were chemicals showing high positive effects in this assay. The responses detected reflected the ability of this assay to detect the fragmentation of DNA molecules produced by DNA single strand breaks induced chemically and those derived from alkali-labile sites developed from alkylated bases and bulky base adducts. The mouse or rat organs exhibiting increased levels of DNA damage were not necessarily the target organs for carcinogenicity. It was rare, in contrast, for the target organs not to show DNA damage. Therefore, organ-specific genotoxicity was necessary but not sufficient for the prediction of organ-specific carcinogenicity. It would be expected that DNA crosslinkers would be difficult to detect by this assay, because of the resulting inhibition of DNA unwinding. The proportion of 10 DNA crosslinkers that was positive, however, was high in the gastrointestinal mucosa, stomach, and colon, but less than 50% in the liver and lung. It was interesting that the genotoxicity of DNA crosslinkers could be detected in the gastrointestinal organs even though the agents were administered intraperitoneally. Chemical carcinogens can be classified as genotoxic (Ames test-positive) and putative nongenotoxic (Ames test-negative) carcinogens. The Ames test is generally used as a first screening method to assess chemical genotoxicity and has provided extensive information on DNA reactivity. Out of 208 chemicals studied, 117 are Ames test-positive rodent carcinogens, 43 are Ames test-negative rodent carcinogens, and 30 are rodent noncarcinogens (which include both Ames test-positive and negative noncarcinogens). High positive response ratio (110/117) for rodent genotoxic carcinogens and a high negative response ratio (6/30) for rodent noncarcinogens were shown in the comet assay. For Ames test-negative rodent carcinogens, less than 50% were positive in the comet assay, suggesting that the assay, which detects DNA lesions, is not suitable for identifying nongenotoxic carcinogens. In the safety evaluation of chemicals, it is important to demonstrate that Ames test-positive agents are not genotoxic in vivo. This assay had a high positive response ratio for rodent genotoxic carcinogens and a high negative response ratio for rodent genotoxic noncarcinogens, suggesting that the comet assay can be used to evaluate the in vivo genotoxicity of in vitro genotoxic chemicals. For chemicals whose in vivo genotoxicity has been tested in multiple organs by the comet assay, published data are summarized with unpublished data and compared with relevant genotoxicity and carcinogenicity data. Because it is clear that no single test is capable of detecting all relevant genotoxic agents, the usual approach should be to carry out a battery of in vitro and in vivo tests for genotoxicity. The conventional micronucleus test in the hematopoietic system is a simple method to assess in vivo clastogenicity of chemicals. Its performance is related to whether a chemical reaches the hematopoietic system. Among 208 chemicals studied (including 165 rodent carcinogens), 54 rodents carcinogens do not induce micronuclei in mouse hematopoietic system despite the positive finding with one or two in vitro tests. Forty-nine of 54 rodent carcinogens that do not induce micronuclei were positive in the comet assay, suggesting that the comet assay can be used as a further in vivo test apart from the cytogenetic assays in hematopoietic cells. In this review, we provide one recommendation for the in vivo comet assay protocol based on our own data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11145306     DOI: 10.1080/10408440008951123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  23 in total

1.  A comparison of transgenic rodent mutation and in vivo comet assay responses for 91 chemicals.

Authors:  David Kirkland; Dan D Levy; Matthew J LeBaron; Marilyn J Aardema; Carol Beevers; Javed Bhalli; George R Douglas; Patricia A Escobar; Christopher S Farabaugh; Melanie Guerard; George E Johnson; Rohan Kulkarni; Frank Le Curieux; Alexandra S Long; Jasmin Lott; David P Lovell; Mirjam Luijten; Francesco Marchetti; John J Nicolette; Stefan Pfuhler; Daniel J Roberts; Leon F Stankowski; Veronique Thybaud; Sandy K Weiner; Andrew Williams; Kristine L Witt; Robert Young
Journal:  Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 2.873

Review 2.  Evaluating the mechanistic evidence and key data gaps in assessing the potential carcinogenicity of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers in humans.

Authors:  Eileen D Kuempel; Marie-Claude Jaurand; Peter Møller; Yasuo Morimoto; Norihiro Kobayashi; Kent E Pinkerton; Linda M Sargent; Roel C H Vermeulen; Bice Fubini; Agnes B Kane
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 5.635

3.  Mammary carcinogen-protein binding potentials: novel and biologically relevant structure-activity relationship model descriptors.

Authors:  A R Cunningham; S Qamar; C A Carrasquer; P A Holt; J M Maguire; S L Cunningham; J O Trent
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Evaluating the potential genotoxicity of phthalates esters (PAEs) in perfumes using in vitro assays.

Authors:  Iman Al-Saleh; Tahreer Al-Rajudi; Ghofran Al-Qudaihi; Pulicat Manogaran
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 5.  Metabolic toxicity screening using electrochemiluminescence arrays coupled with enzyme-DNA biocolloid reactors and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Eli G Hvastkovs; John B Schenkman; James F Rusling
Journal:  Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif)       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 10.745

6.  Chemical structure determines target organ carcinogenesis in rats.

Authors:  C A Carrasquer; N Malik; G States; S Qamar; S L Cunningham; A R Cunningham
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.000

7.  Genetic Alterations in Pesticide Exposed Bolivian Farmers: An evaluation by analysis of chromosomal aberrations and the comet assay.

Authors:  Erik Jørs; Ana Rosa Gonzáles; Maria Eugenia Ascarrunz; Noemi Tirado; Catharina Takahashi; Erika Lafuente; Raquel A Dos Santos; Natalia Bailon; Rafael Cervantes; Huici O; Jesper Bælum; Flemming Lander
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2007-11-12

8.  Is the comet assay a sensitive procedure for detecting genotoxicity?

Authors:  Satomi Kawaguchi; Takanori Nakamura; Ayumi Yamamoto; Gisho Honda; Yu F Sasaki
Journal:  J Nucleic Acids       Date:  2010-11-01

9.  1alpha, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 prevents DNA damage and restores antioxidant enzymes in rat hepatocarcinogenesis induced by diethylnitrosamine and promoted by phenobarbital.

Authors:  Mahendrakumar Chandrasekharappa Banakar; Suresh Kanna Paramasivan; Mitali Basu Chattopadhyay; Subrata Datta; Prabir Chakraborty; Malay Chatterjee; Kalaiselvi Kannan; Elayaraja Thygarajan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Comet assay evaluation of six chemicals of known genotoxic potential in rats.

Authors:  Cheryl A Hobbs; Leslie Recio; Michael Streicker; Molly H Boyle; Jin Tanaka; Atsushi Shiga; Kristine L Witt
Journal:  Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 2.873

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.