Literature DB >> 11145236

Population pharmacokinetics of temozolomide in cancer patients.

J F Jen1, D L Cutler, S M Pai, V K Batra, M B Affrime, D N Zambas, S Heft, G Hajian.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate covariate effects on the pharmacokinetics of temozolomide in cancer patients, and to explore the dose-pharmacokinetics-toxicity relationship of temozolomide.
METHODS: Non-linear mixed-effects modeling approach was used to analyze the data from 445 patients enrolled in eleven Phase I and Phase II clinical trials. All patients in the phase I trials had advanced cancer. Patients in the phase II trials had anaplastic astrocytoma (AA), glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) or malignant melanoma (MM). A sparse sampling scheme was prospectively developed using Phase I data and was successfully implemented in Phase II trials. Population factors included age, gender, height (HT), weight (WT), body surface area (BSA), serum creatinine (Sr.Cr.), estimated creatinine clearance, serum chemistry data as indices of hepatic function and disease, smoking status, and selected concomitant medications. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the toxicity and temozolomide dose and exposure relationship.
RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of temozolomide follows a one-compartment model with first order absorption and elimination. Temozolomide clearance (CL) increased with BSA for both genders. The population mean clearance for GBM or AA patients was 11.2 L/hr for male with BSA equal to 2.0 m2, and 8.8 L/hr for female with BSA equal to 1.7 m2. The mean clearance for MM patients was slightly higher. The inter-subject variability in clearance was 15%, and the residual variability was 26%. Other factors investigated in this analysis had little effect on clearance. The overall incidence of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were 5-8%. Temozolomide dose and AUC did not predict nadir neutrophil and platelet counts due to large variability in counts.
CONCLUSIONS: The current dose regimen is administered according to BSA which is the most important factor influencing temozolomide clearance. No further dose adjustment is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11145236     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026403805756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  13 in total

1.  A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916.

Authors:  D Du Bois; E F Du Bois
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.008

2.  Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine.

Authors:  D W Cockcroft; M H Gault
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.847

3.  Anti-tumour imidazotetrazines. Part XXI. Mitozolomide and temozolomide: probes for the major groove of DNA.

Authors:  A S Clark; M F Stevens; C E Sansom; C H Schwalbe
Journal:  Anticancer Drug Des       Date:  1990-02

4.  Characterisation of urinary metabolites of temozolomide in humans and mice and evaluation of their cytotoxicity.

Authors:  L L Tsang; P B Farmer; A Gescher; J A Slack
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Evaluation of methods for estimating population pharmacokinetic parameters. III. Monoexponential model: routine clinical pharmacokinetic data.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S L Beal
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1983-06

6.  Evaluation of methods for estimating population pharmacokinetic parameters. II. Biexponential model and experimental pharmacokinetic data.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S L Beal
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1981-10

7.  Antitumour imidazotetrazines--XVIII. Modification of the level of 5-methylcytosine in DNA by 3-substituted imidazotetrazinones.

Authors:  M J Tisdale
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1989-04-01       Impact factor: 5.858

8.  Antitumor activity and pharmacokinetics in mice of 8-carbamoyl-3-methyl-imidazo[5,1-d]-1,2,3,5-tetrazin-4(3H)-one (CCRG 81045; M & B 39831), a novel drug with potential as an alternative to dacarbazine.

Authors:  M F Stevens; J A Hickman; S P Langdon; D Chubb; L Vickers; R Stone; G Baig; C Goddard; N W Gibson; J A Slack
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1987-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Comparison of the cytotoxicity in vitro of temozolomide and dacarbazine, prodrugs of 3-methyl-(triazen-1-yl)imidazole-4-carboxamide.

Authors:  L L Tsang; C P Quarterman; A Gescher; J A Slack
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Phase I trial of temozolomide (CCRG 81045: M&B 39831: NSC 362856).

Authors:  E S Newlands; G R Blackledge; J A Slack; G J Rustin; D B Smith; N S Stuart; C P Quarterman; R Hoffman; M F Stevens; M H Brampton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Overcoming the challenges in the effective delivery of chemotherapies to CNS solid tumors.

Authors:  Hemant Sarin
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2010-08

Review 2.  Pharmacology of anticancer drugs in the elderly population.

Authors:  Hans Wildiers; Martin S Highley; Ernst A de Bruijn; Allan T van Oosterom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Covariate pharmacokinetic model building in oncology and its potential clinical relevance.

Authors:  Markus Joerger
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  A new approach to modeling covariate effects and individualization in population pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Tze Leung Lai; Mei-Chiung Shih; Samuel P Wong
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 5.  Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for treatment optimization in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Anthe S Zandvliet; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio dynamics during concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for glioblastoma is an independent predictor for overall survival.

Authors:  Matthew Mason; Catherine Maurice; Mairead G McNamara; Minh Thi Tieu; Zarnie Lwin; Barbara-Ann Millar; Cynthia Menard; Normand Laperriere; Michael Milosevic; Eshetu G Atenafu; Warren Mason; Caroline Chung
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 7.  Pharmacotherapy of Glioblastoma: Established Treatments and Emerging Concepts.

Authors:  Enrico Franceschi; Santino Minichillo; Alba A Brandes
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.749

8.  Improved survival for elderly married glioblastoma patients : Better treatment delivery, less toxicity, and fewer disease complications.

Authors:  Florian Putz; Tobias Putz; Nicole Goerig; Stefan Knippen; Thomas Gryc; Ilker Eyüpoglu; Karl Rössler; Sabine Semrau; Sebastian Lettmaier; Rainer Fietkau
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Disposition of temozolomide in a patient with glioblastoma multiforme after gastric bypass surgery.

Authors:  Deric M Park; Dhvani D Shah; Merrill J Egorin; Jan H Beumer
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Evaluation of the exposure equivalence of oral versus intravenous temozolomide.

Authors:  Blanca D Diez; Paul Statkevich; Yali Zhu; Malaz A Abutarif; Fengjuan Xuan; Bhavna Kantesaria; David Cutler; Marc Cantillon; Max Schwarz; Maria Guadalupe Pallotta; Fabio H Ottaviano
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.