Literature DB >> 11144909

The importance of the social environment for physically active lifestyle--results from an international study.

T Ståhl1, A Rütten, D Nutbeam, A Bauman, L Kannas, T Abel, G Lüschen, D J Rodriquez, J Vinck, J van der Zee.   

Abstract

Physically active lifestyles are regularly associated with improved health and quality of life. Differences in lifestyles in society can partly be understood through the differences in the social and physical environment. This study examines the relationships between reported physical activity, and the extent of perceived support for physical activity in the physical and policy environment (e.g. facilities, programmes and other opportunities), and in the social environment. The data for the study come from a cross-cultural health policy study called MAREPS. In total, 3342 adults, 18 years or older, from six countries (Belgium, Finland, Germany, The Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland) were interviewed via telephone. Respondents were categorised as active or inactive according to self-reported physical activity. Social environmental factors and physical and policy environmental factors were also assessed. The analysis of the data was informed by social cognitive theory, although the study was not originally designed for this purpose. Sixty-eight percent of females and 70% of males were active. The proportions of active and inactive varied by countries to a great extent. The strongest independent predictor of being physically active was social environment. Those who perceived low social support from their personal environment (i.e. family, friends, school and workplace) were more than twice as likely to be sedentary compared to those who reported high social support from their personal environment. Specific knowledge of the programmes and actions for physical activity and sport was also a strong predictor of being active. A supportive physical and policy environment was not associated with participation in physical activity as strongly as had been anticipated. The variation between countries was stronger predictor of being active than the physical and policy environment variables. This study generates the hypotheses and raises the questions that in a preliminary way, there appears to be some relationships between aspects of physical and social environment and physical activity participation. However, future research is needed to refine and clarify this.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11144909     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00116-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  49 in total

Review 1.  Residential environments and cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Ana V Diez Roux
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 2.  Racial and spatial relations as fundamental determinants of health in Detroit.

Authors:  Amy J Schulz; David R Williams; Barbara A Israel; Lora Bex Lempert
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Reliability of self-reported neighborhood characteristics.

Authors:  Sandra E Echeverria; Ana V Diez-Roux; Bruce G Link
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.671

4.  The role of peer social network factors and physical activity in adolescent girls.

Authors:  Carolyn C Voorhees; David Murray; Greg Welk; Amanda Birnbaum; Kurt M Ribisl; Carolyn C Johnson; Karin Allor Pfeiffer; Brit Saksvig; Jared B Jobe
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr

5.  Availability of physical activity-related facilities and neighborhood demographic and socioeconomic characteristics: a national study.

Authors:  Lisa M Powell; Sandy Slater; Frank J Chaloupka; Deborah Harper
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Contribution of neighbourhood socioeconomic status and physical activity resources to physical activity among women.

Authors:  Rebecca E Lee; Catherine Cubbin; Marilyn Winkleby
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Relative influences of individual, social environmental, and physical environmental correlates of walking.

Authors:  Billie Giles-Corti; Robert J Donovan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Impact of a senior fitness program on measures of physical and emotional health and functioning.

Authors:  Brent Hamar; Carter R Coberley; James E Pope; Elizabeth Y Rula
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 2.459

9.  Everyday physical activity in ambulatory heart transplant candidates: the role of expected health benefits, social support, and potential barriers.

Authors:  Andreas Gerhardt; Gerdi Weidner; Mariel Grassmann; Heike Spaderna
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2014-04

10.  The association between family and friend integration and physical activity: results from the NHIS.

Authors:  Britta A Larsen; David Strong; Sarah E Linke
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2014-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.