Literature DB >> 11144812

Estimating the economic effects of cystic echinococcosis: Uruguay, a developing country with upper-middle income.

P R Torgerson1, C Carmona, R Bonifacino.   

Abstract

Cost-benefit analyses, run before the commencement of a programme to control a parasitic disease, should include estimates of the economic losses attributable to the disease. Uruguay, a middle-income, developing country, has a recent history of persistent problems with cystic echinococcosis, in both its human population and livestock. The economic effects in Uruguay of this disease, caused by the larval stage of the canine tapeworm Echinococcus granulosus, have now been evaluated. Data on the incidence of the disease, in humans and livestock, were used to construct cost estimates. The estimated minimum cost (U.S.$2.9 million/year) was based on the condemnation costs of infected offal together with the actual costs of the hospital treatment of the human cases. The estimate of the maximum cost (U.S.$22.1 million/year) also included the production losses resulting from lower livestock efficiency and the reduced income of individuals with morbidity attributable to the disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11144812     DOI: 10.1080/00034983.2000.11813594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Trop Med Parasitol        ISSN: 0003-4983


  10 in total

1.  Analysis of the economic impact of cystic echinococcosis in Spain.

Authors:  Christine Benner; Hélène Carabin; Luisa P Sánchez-Serrano; Christine M Budke; David Carmena
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  The Economic Impact of Cystic Echinococcosis in Rio Negro Province, Argentina.

Authors:  Glenda M Bingham; Edmundo Larrieu; Leonardo Uchiumi; Carlos Mercapide; Guillermo Mujica; Mario Del Carpio; Eduardo Hererro; Juan Carlos Salvitti; Bo Norby; Christine M Budke
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  Cystic echinococcosis in Jordan: socioeconomic evaluation and risk factors.

Authors:  M A Nasrieh; S K Abdel-Hafez; S A Kamhawi; P S Craig; P M Schantz
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2003-05-28       Impact factor: 2.289

4.  Economic impact of cystic echinococcosis in peru.

Authors:  Pedro L Moro; Christine M Budke; Peter M Schantz; Julio Vasquez; Saul J Santivañez; Jaime Villavicencio
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2011-05-24

5.  Prevalence and monetary loss due to cystic Echinococcosis in slaughter house livestock: A case study of Migori County, Kenya.

Authors:  Odero Joseph Kere; Erume Joseph; Banda Liveness Jessika; Kagira John Maina
Journal:  Parasite Epidemiol Control       Date:  2019-04-15

6.  Epidemiological and histomorphic studies in sheep infected with hydatid cyst in Taif area.

Authors:  Jamila Al Malki; Nibal Ahmed
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 4.219

7.  The monetary burden of cystic echinococcosis in Iran.

Authors:  Majid Fasihi Harandi; Christine M Budke; Sima Rostami
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2012-11-29

8.  Global socioeconomic impact of cystic echinococcosis.

Authors:  Christine M Budke; Peter Deplazes; Paul R Torgerson
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Cystic echinococcosis in the Province of Álava, North Spain: the monetary burden of a disease no longer under surveillance.

Authors:  Hélène Carabin; Francisco J Balsera-Rodríguez; José Rebollar-Sáenz; Christine T Benner; Aitziber Benito; Juan C Fernández-Crespo; David Carmena
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2014-08-07

10.  The socio-economic burden of cystic echinococcosis in Morocco: A combination of estimation method.

Authors:  Aouatif Saadi; Fatimaezzahra Amarir; Hind Filali; Séverine Thys; Abdelkbir Rhalem; Nathalie Kirschvink; Marianne Raes; Tanguy Marcotty; Mohamed Oukessou; Luc Duchateau; Hamid Sahibi; Nicolas Antoine-Moussiaux
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2020-07-31
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.