Literature DB >> 11144312

Outcome of 306 twin deliveries according to first twin presentation and method of delivery.

D Grisaru1, S Fuchs, M J Kupferminc, J Har-Toov, J Niv, J B Lessing.   

Abstract

The objective of this manuscript is to examine the effect of presentation of the first twin and mode of delivery on perintal outcome in twin deliveries. We reviewed all records of twin deliveries at a gestational age of 32 weeks and more from January 1, 1989 to December 31, 1995. Study cases were divided according to the first twin presentation (vertex = group A, nonvertex = group B) and then subdivided according to the planned mode of delivery, vaginal trial of labor (VTOL), and cesarean section (CS). The protocol for group A facilitated an attempt at vaginal delivery and for group B, vaginal delivery was considered as for a singleton fetus in breech presentation. Of 306 pairs of twins, 235 were in group A and 71 in group B. In group A, 219 women (93.2%) were eligible for VTOL, and the remaining 16 underwent CS. Thirty-three group B women were eligible for VTOL (46.5%; p<0.001) and 38 had CS. In group A, of the 219 candidates for VTOL, 199 (90.9%) delivered vaginally and 20 underwent a CS. In group B, of the 33 VTOL candidates 18 (54.5%) delivered vaginally and 15 underwent CS. Neonatal outcome did not differ in relation to the presentation of the first twin or the planned/actual mode of delivery. There were no cases of birth trauma, neurological complications, or perinatal mortality. Trial of vaginal labor is safe in twin deliveries with the first twin in vertex presentation. Provided criteria for vaginal breech delivery are adhered to, this also appears to be a reasonable option in twin deliveries with the first twin in nonvertex presentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11144312     DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-13443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  6 in total

1.  An evidence-based approach to determining route of delivery for twin gestations.

Authors:  Diane Christopher; Barrett K Robinson; Alan M Peaceman
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011

2.  Twin Birth Considering the Current Results of the "Twin Birth Study"

Authors:  B Seelbach-Goebel
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Cesarean delivery for the second twin.

Authors:  James M Alexander; Kenneth J Leveno; Dwight Rouse; Mark B Landon; Sharon A Gilbert; Catherine Y Spong; Michael W Varner; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; Steven G Gabbe
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 4.  Planned caesarean section for women with a twin pregnancy.

Authors:  G Justus Hofmeyr; Jon F Barrett; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-19

Review 5.  Planned caesarean section for women with a twin pregnancy.

Authors:  G Justus Hofmeyr; Jon F Barrett; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-12-07

Review 6.  Mode of delivery in non-cephalic presenting twins: a systematic review.

Authors:  Charlotte N Steins Bisschop; Tatjana E Vogelvang; Anne M May; Nico W E Schuitemaker
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 2.344

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.