Literature DB >> 11143914

Acute low back pain: predictive index of chronicity from a cohort of 2487 subjects. Spine Group of the Société Française de Rhumatologie.

J P Valat1, P Goupille, S Rozenberg, R Urbinelli, F Allaert.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Low back pain (LBP)-related disability involves patients with chronic outcome.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the factors predictive of chronic evolution of acute LBP and to develop a predictive clinical index. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective investigation of 2487 employed patients referred for their first consultation with acute LBP (less than eight days). Chronic evolution defined by persistence of symptoms, unchanged or worse, at seven weeks. A predictive index was developed according to a logistic regression model.
RESULTS: One hundred fifty-five patients (6.2%) were considered to have unchanged or worsened LBP at the time of final evaluation, which was carried out on average 42 +/- 15 days after the initial visit, and were thus regarded as having a chronic outcome. When comparing patients with chronic outcome and the others, there were 25 elementary characteristics for which the degree of significance of the bilateral test was less than 0.01. They were introduced into a logistic regression model. Five parameters appeared to be related to chronic outcome: characteristics of current episode (isolated acute low back pain, acute exacerbation of chronic low back pain, sciatica), two daily living activity items, duration of certificate to remain off work and taking part in a sport. They were used to develop an easily applied index providing identification, as of the initial consultation, of the risk of chronic evolution.
CONCLUSION: The early recognition of patients with LBP with high risk of chronic outcome can be achieved with an easily applied clinical index.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11143914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Joint Bone Spine        ISSN: 1297-319X            Impact factor:   4.929


  6 in total

1.  The prognosis of acute and persistent low-back pain: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luciola da C Menezes Costa; Christopher G Maher; Mark J Hancock; James H McAuley; Robert D Herbert; Leonardo O P Costa
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The association of comorbidities, utilization and costs for patients identified with low back pain.

Authors:  Debra P Ritzwoller; Laurie Crounse; Susan Shetterly; Dale Rublee
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Radiating low back pain in general practice: incidence, prevalence, diagnosis, and long-term clinical course of illness.

Authors:  Antje Spijker-Huiges; Feikje Groenhof; Jan C Winters; Marten van Wijhe; Klaas H Groenier; Klaas van der Meer
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 2.581

4.  Frequency and interrelations of risk factors for chronic low back pain in a primary care setting.

Authors:  Marie-Martine Lefevre-Colau; Fouad Fayad; François Rannou; Jacques Fermanian; Fernand Coriat; Yann Mace; Michel Revel; Serge Poiraudeau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effect of a simple information booklet on pain persistence after an acute episode of low back pain: a non-randomized trial in a primary care setting.

Authors:  Emmanuel Coudeyre; Florence Tubach; François Rannou; Gabriel Baron; Fernand Coriat; Sylvie Brin; Michel Revel; Serge Poiraudeau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Absence from work and return to work in people with back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gwenllian Wynne-Jones; Jemma Cowen; Joanne L Jordan; Olalekan Uthman; Chris J Main; Nick Glozier; Danielle van der Windt
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.402

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.