Literature DB >> 11143733

Effectiveness of local anesthesia in pediatric dental practice.

Y Nakai1, P Milgrom, L Mancl, S E Coldwell, P K Domoto, D S Ramsay.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pain control in dental treatment for children is very important. The purpose of this study is to describe the characteristics of local anesthetic use by pediatric dentists and to examine factors related to its effectiveness in children.
METHODS: The authors observed 361 patients in 17 pediatric dental practices in Washington state while each child received restorative or surgical dental treatment. The authors recorded data concerning local anesthetic use and effectiveness. The children's mean age was 87 months, and 181 (50.1 percent) of the patients were girls. A pediatric dentist observer rated each child's anxiety before the initial injection of local anesthetic and the effectiveness of pain control during restorative treatment. The observing dentist asked the treating dentist about the effectiveness of pain control after completion of treatment.
RESULTS: Forty-two of 361 children (11.6 percent) were observed to experience ineffective pain control. Fourteen of 17 dentists (82.4 percent) were observed to have at least one patient in whom pain control was ineffective. Lidocaine (2 percent with 1:100,000 epinephrine) was used by 15 of 17 dentists (88.2 percent) and in 312 of 361 cases (86.4 percent). The average amount of agent was one cartridge (36 milligrams of lidocaine). Children who were anxious, who had symptoms before treatment, and who underwent more invasive operative and endodontic procedures were more likely to experience ineffective pain control.
CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that painful treatment is relatively frequent even in specialized pediatric practice. Variability in general practice is likely to be greater. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The incidence of ineffective pain control may be less if clinicians use methods to reduce anxiety and perioperative infection and symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11143733     DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8177            Impact factor:   3.634


  17 in total

1.  The influence of restorative treatment approaches and the use of local analgesia, on the children's discomfort.

Authors:  J A van Bochove; W E van Amerongen
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2006-03

2.  Comparison of Pain Perception Using Conventional Versus Computer-Controlled Intraligamentary Local Anesthetic Injection for Extraction of Primary Molars.

Authors:  Meenu Mittal; Radhika Chopra; Ashok Kumar; Dhirendra Srivastava
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2019

3.  Expectations, acceptance and preferences of patients in treatment with orthodontic mini-implants: part II: implant removal.

Authors:  Sandra Lehnen; Fraser McDonald; Christoph Bourauel; Andreas Jäger; Martin Baxmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Comparison of Effects Exerted by 4% Articaine Buccal Infiltration and 2% Lidocaine Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block on Pain Perception and Behavioral Feedback of Children during Pulp Treatment of Mandibular Second Primary Molars.

Authors:  Leila Erfanparast; Mahdi Rahbar; Maryam Pourkazemi; Masoumeh Vatandoust; Sabra Balar; Ali Vafaei
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2020-12

5.  Patient expectations, acceptance and preferences in treatment with orthodontic mini-implants. A randomly controlled study. Part I: insertion techniques.

Authors:  Sandra Lehnen; Fraser McDonald; Christoph Bourauel; Martin Baxmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Comparative efficacy of active and passive distraction during restorative treatment in children using an iPad versus audiovisual eyeglasses: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  R H Attar; Z D Baghdadi
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2014-11-22

7.  Lidocaine Ineffectiveness Suggests New Psychopharmacology Drug Target.

Authors:  Mark Mintz; Victor Badner; Lynn K Feldman; Pnina Mintz; Mana Saraghi; Jonathan Diaz; Irina Mezhebovsky; Irene Axelrod; Joseph Gleeson; Chang Liu; Cathy Smith; Helen Chow; David Zurakowski; Michael M Segal
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  2022-06-27

Review 8.  Efficacy of Articaine vs Lignocaine for infiltration anaesthesia during primary molar extractions.

Authors:  Song Chen; Jie Xiang; Yan Ji
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.340

9.  A randomized controlled trial comparing mandibular local anesthesia techniques in children receiving nitrous oxide-oxygen sedation.

Authors:  Sinuba Naidu; Pat Loughlin; Susan E Coldwell; Carolyn J Noonan; Peter Milgrom
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2004

10.  Anesthetic efficacy of X-tip intraosseous injection using 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in patients with irreversible pulpitis after inferior alveolar nerve block: A clinical study.

Authors:  Pushpendra Kumar Verma; Ruchi Srivastava; Kumar M Ramesh
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.