Literature DB >> 11142925

[The North American Spine Society Lumbar Spine Outcome Assessment Instrument: translation and psychometric analysis of the German version in rehabilitation patients with chronic back pain].

T Schochat1, W Rehberg, J von Kempis, G Stucki, W H Jäckel.   

Abstract

The "Lumbar Spine Outcome Assessment Instrument", developed by the North American Spine Society (NASS), was translated into German. Its psychometric properties were tested in a group of rehabilitation patients with chronic, unspecific back pain, and in a comparison group of patients in cardiologic rehabilitation. With a Cronbach's alpha of 0.92, internal consistency was high. Principal component analysis revealed that the German version of the NASS instrument surveys the factors "back pain", "neurologic symptoms", and "impairments". A strong correlation with other measures of functional impairment (FFbH-R, IRES) indicates a high concurrent validity of the NASS instrument. After three weeks of inpatient rehabilitation, sensitivity to change could be demonstrated for the summary score of the instrument. This significant change was primarily due to moderate effects in the factor "back pain". In our study population, the factor "impairments" did not show a significant change. On the basis of these results, the German version of "The North American Spine Society Lumbar Spine Outcome Assessment Instrument" can be described as a reliable and valid instrument for measuring back pain, related neurologic symptoms, and back pain-induced impairments in rehabilitation patients. Because the factor "impairments" is not sensitive to change within three weeks of rehabilitation, the instrument is only partly suitable for measuring short-term outcome in rehabilitation patients. Further research is needed to determine if the instrument is useful for middle- and long-term outcome measurement in rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11142925     DOI: 10.1007/s003930070052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Rheumatol        ISSN: 0340-1855            Impact factor:   1.372


  9 in total

1.  [Optimized assessment of the outcome in patients with radicular back pain of the lumbar spine. The modified NASS questionnaire].

Authors:  M Janousek; S Ferrari; U D Schmid; H A Bischoff; M Balsiger; R Theiler
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the NASS outcomes instrument in Spanish patients with low back pain.

Authors:  C Sarasqueta; O Gabaldon; I Iza; F Béland; P M Paz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Occupational advice to help people return to work following lower limb arthroplasty: the OPAL intervention mapping study.

Authors:  Paul Baker; Carol Coole; Avril Drummond; Sayeed Khan; Catriona McDaid; Catherine Hewitt; Lucksy Kottam; Sarah Ronaldson; Elizabeth Coleman; David A McDonald; Fiona Nouri; Melanie Narayanasamy; Iain McNamara; Judith Fitch; Louise Thomson; Gerry Richardson; Amar Rangan
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  Psychometric properties of the WHODASII in rehabilitation patients.

Authors:  Miriam Pösl; Alarcos Cieza; Gerold Stucki
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  [Questionnaires for patients with back pain. Diagnosis and outcome assessment].

Authors:  A Junge; A F Mannion
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  The effectiveness of ergonomic interventions in material handling operations.

Authors:  Steven J Wurzelbacher; Michael P Lampl; Stephen J Bertke; Chih-Yu Tseng
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 3.661

7.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the delphi definitions of low back pain prevalence (German DOLBaPP).

Authors:  Marja Leonhardt; Falk Liebers; Clermont E Dionne; Ute Latza
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Surgical versus conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Marinella Gugliotta; Bruno R da Costa; Essam Dabis; Robert Theiler; Peter Jüni; Stephan Reichenbach; Hans Landolt; Paul Hasler
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Prognostic factors for the improvement of pain and disability following multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with chronic neck pain.

Authors:  Martin Weigl; Josefine Letzel; Felix Angst
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.