Literature DB >> 11142856

Temporal context and conditioned reinforcement value.

R C Grace1, H I Savastano.   

Abstract

The effectiveness of a stimulus as a conditioned reinforcer depends on the temporal context of reinforcement, that is, the overall rate of reinforcement in the situation. The dominant view has been that context determines the learned value of a stimulus directly, according to delay-reduction theory. By contrast, the contextual choice model (CCM) maintains that value is independent of context and incorporates the effects of context on choice in the framework of the matching law. The authors report 2 experiments with pigeons as subjects that use transfer tests to assess the value of stimuli in the concurrent-chains procedure. Results strongly support the assumption of CCM that pigeons learn the temporal relations between events independently of context but that context modulates the expression of that learning as choice.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11142856     DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.129.4.427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  7 in total

1.  Preference and resistance to change in concurrent variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  Matthew C Bell; Ben A Williams
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-02

2.  The value hypothesis and acquisition of preference in concurrent chains.

Authors:  Randolph C Grace
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-02

3.  Temporal context in concurrent chains: I. Terminal-link duration.

Authors:  Randolph C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Initial-link duration and acquisition of preference in concurrent chains.

Authors:  Mark E Berg; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Influence of temporal context on value in the multiple-chains and successive-encounters procedures.

Authors:  Matthew O'Daly; Samuel Angulo; Cassandra Gipson; Edmund Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Failure to obtain value enhancement by within-trial contrast in simultaneous and successive discriminations.

Authors:  Joana Arantes; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Temporal context, preference, and resistance to change.

Authors:  Christopher A Podlesnik; Corina Jimenez-Gomez; Eric A Thrailkill; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.