BACKGROUND: Cancer registries provide a basis for many epidemiological studies in cancer. Electronic data provide for prompt, economical data capture for disease registries; doubts, however, exist about their data quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined the accuracy for cancer registration of a subset of 7043 electronically captured hospital discharge data. RESULTS: Note availability was 82%. Of the notes available for examination demographic data accuracy was high; however, 7.4% of cases coded on discharge as cancer had no malignancy recorded in case notes while 4. 1% had in-situ or benign tumors. Almost a third had some inaccuracy in coding tumor site. Prevalent cases accounted for 17.2% of cases examined reflecting a new registry. Electronic data capture reduces time spent examining notes; only 40% of cases notified from PAS required a quick validation check. It enhances data completeness; without electronic discharge data 11.5% of the final database would have been missed. The validation check prevented overinflation of the cancer registration database by 7.5%. Measures of accuracy in the final database were high. CONCLUSION: This study shows that discharge data are a valuable data source for cancer registries but require a targeted note review aimed at cases without corroborating data.
BACKGROUND:Cancer registries provide a basis for many epidemiological studies in cancer. Electronic data provide for prompt, economical data capture for disease registries; doubts, however, exist about their data quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined the accuracy for cancer registration of a subset of 7043 electronically captured hospital discharge data. RESULTS: Note availability was 82%. Of the notes available for examination demographic data accuracy was high; however, 7.4% of cases coded on discharge as cancer had no malignancy recorded in case notes while 4. 1% had in-situ or benign tumors. Almost a third had some inaccuracy in coding tumor site. Prevalent cases accounted for 17.2% of cases examined reflecting a new registry. Electronic data capture reduces time spent examining notes; only 40% of cases notified from PAS required a quick validation check. It enhances data completeness; without electronic discharge data 11.5% of the final database would have been missed. The validation check prevented overinflation of the cancer registration database by 7.5%. Measures of accuracy in the final database were high. CONCLUSION: This study shows that discharge data are a valuable data source for cancer registries but require a targeted note review aimed at cases without corroborating data.
Authors: L Remontet; N Mitton; C M Couris; J Iwaz; F Gomez; F Olive; S Polazzi; A M Schott; B Trombert; N Bossard; M Colonna Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2008-08-21 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Giovanna Tagliabue; Anna Maghini; Sabrina Fabiano; Andrea Tittarelli; Emanuela Frassoldi; Enrica Costa; Silvia Nobile; Tiziana Codazzi; Paolo Crosignani; Roberto Tessandori; Paolo Contiero Journal: Popul Health Metr Date: 2006-09-28