Literature DB >> 11142210

Cancer mortality in the high background radiation areas of Yangjiang, China during the period between 1979 and 1995.

Z Tao1, Y Zha, S Akiba, Q Sun, J Zou, J Li, Y Liu, H Kato, T Sugahara, L Wei.   

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to estimate cancer risk associated with the low-level radiation exposure of an average annual effective dose of 6.4 mSv (including internal exposure) in the high background-radiation areas (HBRA) in Yangjiang, China. The mortality survey consisted of two steps, i.e., the follow-up of cohort members and the ascertainment of causes of death. The cohort members in HBRA were divided into three dose-groups on the basis of environmental dose-rates per year. The mortality experiences of those three dose groups were compared with those in the residents of control areas by means of relative risk (RR). During the period 1987-1995, we observed 926,226 person-years by following up 106,517 subjects in the cohort study, and accumulated 5,161 deaths, among which 557 were from cancers. We did not observe an increase in cancer mortality in HBRA (RR = 0.96, 96% CI, 0.80 to 1.15). The combined data for the period 1979-95 included 125,079 subjects and accumulated 1,698,316 person-years, observed 10,415 total deaths and 1,003 cancer deaths. The relative risk of all cancers for whole HBRA as compared with the control area was estimated to be 0.99 (95% CI, 0.87 to 1.14). The relative risks of cancers of the stomach, colon, liver, lung, bone, female breast and thyroid within whole HBRA were less than one, while the risks for leukemia, cancers of the nasopharynx, esophagus, rectum, pancreas, skin, cervix uteri, brain and central nervous system, and malignant lymphoma were larger than one. None of them were significantly different from RR = 1. Neither homogeneity tests nor trend tests revealed any statistically significant relationship between cancer risk and radiation dose. We did not find any increased cancer risk associated with the high levels of natural radiation in HBRA. On the contrary, the mortality of all cancers in HBRA was generally lower than that in the control area, but not statistically significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11142210     DOI: 10.1269/jrr.41.s31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiat Res        ISSN: 0449-3060            Impact factor:   2.724


  22 in total

1.  Association between Local External Gamma Rays and Frequency of Cancer in Babol-Iran.

Authors:  Ali Shabestani Monfared; Karimollah Hajian; Reza Hosseini; Akbar Nasir
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data.

Authors:  Maurice Tubiana; Ludwig E Feinendegen; Chichuan Yang; Joseph M Kaminski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Natural radionuclides in soil near a coal-fired power plant in the high background radiation area, South China.

Authors:  Guoqing Liu; Qi Luo; Mingxia Ding; Jiangping Feng
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Cancer mortality, state mean elevations, and other selected predictors.

Authors:  John Hart; Seunggeun Hyun
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Solar and terrestrial radiations explain continental-scale variation in bird pigmentation.

Authors:  Ismael Galván; Alberto Jorge; Carlos Pacheco; Derek Spencer; Duncan J Halley; Christian Itty; Jan Kornan; Jan T Nielsen; Tuomo Ollila; Gunnar Sein; Marian Stój; Juan J Negro
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Tracking radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging devices at the NIH.

Authors:  Ronald D Neumann; David A Bluemke
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Radiation hormesis: historical perspective and implications for low-dose cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Alexander M Vaiserman
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 8.  Radioadaptive response revisited.

Authors:  Soile Tapio; Vesna Jacob
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 9.  Human exposure to high natural background radiation: what can it teach us about radiation risks?

Authors:  Jolyon H Hendry; Steven L Simon; Andrzej Wojcik; Mehdi Sohrabi; Werner Burkart; Elisabeth Cardis; Dominique Laurier; Margot Tirmarche; Isamu Hayata
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 1.394

Review 10.  Strengths and Weaknesses of Dosimetry Used in Studies of Low-Dose Radiation Exposure and Cancer.

Authors:  Robert D Daniels; Gerald M Kendall; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Martha S Linet; Harry M Cullings
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.