Literature DB >> 11141854

Predictors of time spent on partner notification in four US sites.

B A Macke1, M H Hennessy, M McFarlane.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify determinants of time spent on partner notification clients in four STD programmes in the United States.
METHODS: 11 disease intervention specialists (DIS) in each of three urban sites (n = 33) and seven DIS in one rural site recorded their activities and clients for 14 working days. The total amount of time for partner notification activities was computed for each client. Data were analysed using random effects regression.
RESULTS: Across sites, 429 of 2506 (37.4%) recorded hours were spent on partner notification (PN) activities with 1148 clients. Client type, STD diagnosis, outcome, demographic characteristics, mileage, and study site explained 33.7% of the variance in the total time spent on partner notification clients. Clients who took significantly more time than the reference case included those who were both contacts and original patients, HIV/AIDS clients, non-primary and secondary (P&S) syphilis clients, STD clients who were infected and treated, and clients for whom travel was necessary. Demographic characteristics of both client and worker were not associated with the time spent on partner notification.
CONCLUSIONS: These data document the labour intensive nature of partner notification, especially for HIV and non-P&S syphilis clients. STD programmes that have a higher number of these clients are probably dedicating more resources to partner notification. More research is needed on additional predictors so that programmes can better understand and allocate staff and financial resources to partner notification activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11141854      PMCID: PMC1744202          DOI: 10.1136/sti.76.5.371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  6 in total

1.  Gonorrhea and chlamydial infection: comparison of contact tracing performed by physicians or by a specialized service.

Authors:  M Alary; J R Joly; C Poulin
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr

2.  Partner notification in the real world: a four site time-allocation study.

Authors:  B A Macke; M Hennessy; M M McFarlane; M J Bliss
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Efficiency and cost-effectiveness of field follow-up for patients with Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a sexually transmitted diseases clinic.

Authors:  B P Katz; C S Danos; T S Quinn; V Caine; R B Jones
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1988 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  A regression approach to the analysis of data arising from cluster randomization.

Authors:  A Donner
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Notification of the sex and needle-sharing partners of individuals with human immunodeficiency virus in rural South Carolina: 30-month experience.

Authors:  R F Wykoff; J L Jones; S T Longshore; S L Hollis; C B Quiller; H Dowda; W B Gamble
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1991 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Results of a randomized trial of partner notification in cases of HIV infection in North Carolina.

Authors:  S E Landis; V J Schoenbach; D J Weber; M Mittal; B Krishan; K Lewis; G G Koch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-01-09       Impact factor: 91.245

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Cost Analysis and Performance Assessment of Partner Services for Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Sexually Transmitted Diseases, New York State, 2014.

Authors:  Britney L Johnson; James Tesoriero; Wenhui Feng; Feng Qian; Erika G Martin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Improving partner services by embedding disease intervention specialists in HIV-clinics.

Authors:  Melanie M Taylor; Tom Mickey; Michelle Winscott; Heather James; Kerry Kenney; Bob England
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Methods for Sexually Transmitted Disease Prevention Programs to Estimate the Health and Medical Cost Impact of Changes in Their Budget.

Authors:  Harrell W Chesson; Jennifer A Ludovic; Andrés A Berruti; Thomas L Gift
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Would targeting increase efficiency of syphilis partner services programs?--Data from New York City, Philadelphia, Texas, and Virginia.

Authors:  Brooke E Hoots; Felicia M T Lewis; Greta Anschuetz; Julia A Schillinger; Susan Blank; Tammy Foskey; Jeffrey A Stover; Thomas A Peterman
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.830

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.