Literature DB >> 11141637

Restoration of vision by training of residual functions.

B A Sabel1, E Kasten.   

Abstract

A new paradigm emerges: visual field defects after optic nerve or brain injury are partially reversible. Using high-resolution visual field tests, areas of residual vision can be identified which are characterized by impaired vision (relative defect) with some residual capacities. By repetitively stimulating these partially damaged areas with daily computer-based visual restitution training it is now possible to enlarge the visual field. Average border shifts of 5 degrees (range, 0 to 20 degrees) have been found in clinical trials, and training is effective even when started years after the injury. Visual restitution training is useful for the treatment of patients with stroke, head injury, or partial optic nerve damage, as long as the patient presents some residual vision. The improved vision is maintained in most patients after training is discontinued. Brain plasticity is likely to provide the substrate for restoration of vision, opening new opportunities to treat partial blindness, which has been considered irreversible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11141637     DOI: 10.1097/00055735-200012000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1040-8738            Impact factor:   3.761


  15 in total

1.  Vision restoration therapy: confounded by eye movements.

Authors:  J C Horton
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Vision restoration therapy and raising red flags too early.

Authors:  Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Does visual restitution training change absolute homonymous visual field defects? A fundus controlled study.

Authors:  J Reinhard; A Schreiber; U Schiefer; E Kasten; B A Sabel; S Kenkel; R Vonthein; S Trauzettel-Klosinski
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke.

Authors:  Alex Pollock; Christine Hazelton; Fiona J Rowe; Sven Jonuscheit; Ashleigh Kernohan; Jayne Angilley; Clair A Henderson; Peter Langhorne; Pauline Campbell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-23

5.  Scanning training in neurological vision loss: case studies.

Authors:  Paul Koons; Scott Johnson; John Kingston; Gregory L Goodrich
Journal:  Eye Brain       Date:  2010-05-24

6.  A computerized perimeter for assessing modality-specific visual field loss.

Authors:  Finnegan J Calabro; Lucia M Vaina
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

7.  Influence of uncorrected ametropia on computer-based perimetry in patients with visual field defects and normal subjects.

Authors:  Sandra Jobke; Erich Kasten; Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-06

Review 8.  Neuro-visual rehabilitation.

Authors:  Noa Raz; Netta Levin
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Temporal profile of functional visual rehabilitative outcomes modulated by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; Souzana N Obretenova; Mary Lou Jackson; Lotfi B Merabet
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2012-02-29

Review 10.  Adaptive neuroplastic responses in early and late hemispherectomized monkeys.

Authors:  Mark W Burke; Ron Kupers; Maurice Ptito
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.