Literature DB >> 11140914

Experience of healthcare workers taking postexposure prophylaxis after occupational HIV exposures: findings of the HIV Postexposure Prophylaxis Registry.

S A Wang1, A L Panlilio, P A Doi, A D White, M Stek, A Saah.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To collect information about the safety of taking antiretroviral drugs for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) postexposure prophylaxis (PEP).
DESIGN: A voluntary, confidential registry.
SETTING: Hospital occupational health clinics, emergency departments, private physician offices, and health departments in the United States.
RESULTS: 492 healthcare workers (HCWs) who had occupational exposures to HIV, were prescribed HIV PEP, and agreed to be enrolled in the registry by their healthcare providers were prospectively enrolled in the registry. Three hundred eight (63%) of 492 of the PEP regimens prescribed for these HCWs consisted of at least three antiretroviral agents. Of the 449 HCWs for whom 6-week follow-up was available, 195 (43%) completed the PEP regimen as initially prescribed. Forty-four percent (n=197) of HCWs discontinued all PEP drugs and did not complete a PEP regimen. Thirteen percent (n=57) discontinued > or =1 drug or modified drug dosage or added a drug but did complete a course of PEP Among the 254 HCWs who modified or discontinued the PEP regimen, the two most common reasons for doing so were because of adverse effects attributed to PEP (54%) and because the source-patient turned out to be HIV-negative (38%). Overall, 340 (76%) HCWs with 6-week follow-up reported some symptoms while on PEP: nausea (57%), fatigue or malaise (38%), headache (18%), vomiting (16%), diarrhea (14%), and myalgias or arthralgias (6%). The median time from start of PEP to onset of each of the five most frequently reported symptoms was 3 to 4 days. Only 37 (8%) HCWs with 6-week follow-up were reported to have laboratory abnormalities; review of the reported abnormalities revealed that most were unremarkable. Serious adverse events were reported to the registry for 6 HCWs; all but one event resolved by the 6-month follow-up visit. Fewer side effects were reported by HCWs taking two-drug PEP regimens than by HCWs taking three-drug PEP regimens.
CONCLUSIONS: Side effects from HIV PEP were very common but were rarely severe or serious. The nature and frequency of HIV PEP toxicity were consistent with information already available on the use of these antiretroviral agents. Clinicians prescribing HIV PEP need to counsel HCWs about PEP side effects and should know how to manage PEP toxicity when it arises.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11140914     DOI: 10.1086/501736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  17 in total

1.  Timing, adherence, resistance, and ... persistence? new insight into the mechanisms of failure of HIV type 1 postexposure prophylaxis.

Authors:  Gustavo H Kijak; Jerome H Kim
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 2.  How to develop a standard operating procedure for sorting unfixed cells.

Authors:  Ingrid Schmid
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.608

3.  Unconsented HIV testing in cases of occupational exposure: ethics, law, and policy.

Authors:  Ethan Cowan; Ruth Macklin
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 4.  Tolerability of postexposure antiretroviral prophylaxis for occupational exposures to HIV.

Authors:  L M Lee; D K Henderson
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  HIV infection.

Authors:  Martin Talbot
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-07-31

6.  Antiretrovirals to prevent HIV infection: pre- and postexposure prophylaxis.

Authors:  Cynthia L Gay; Myron S Cohen
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.725

7.  Association of the dominant hand and needle stick injuries for healthcare workers in Taiwan.

Authors:  N Mbirimtengerenji; J Schaio; L Y Guo; A Muula
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.875

8.  Tolerability and efficacy of PI versus NNRTI-based regimens in subjects receiving HAART during acute or early HIV infection.

Authors:  Linda G Apuzzo; Florin Vaida; Joel E Gallant; Karin B Ernstrom; Susan J Little; Jean-Pierre Routy; Ann C Collier; Brian Conway; Martin H Markowitz; Frederick M Hecht; Bruce D Walker; Elizabeth Connick; Joseph B Margolick
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 9.  Antiretroviral post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for occupational HIV exposure.

Authors:  T N Young; F J Arens; G E Kennedy; J W Laurie; G w Rutherford
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-01-24

10.  Post-exposure prophylaxis following occupational exposure to HIV and hepatitis B: an analysis of a 12-year record in a Nigerian tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Salisu Abubakar; Garba Iliyasu; Farouq Muhammad Dayyab; Salisu Inuwa; Rabiu Alhassan Tudun Wada; Nasiru Magaji Sadiq; Muktar Ahmed Gadanya; Abdulrahman Abba Sheshe; Mohammad Sani Mijinyawa; Abdulrazaq Garba Habib
Journal:  J Infect Prev       Date:  2017-12-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.