Literature DB >> 11140204

The pros and cons of data analysis software for qualitative research.

W St John1, P Johnson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore the use of computer-based qualitative data analysis software packages. SCOPE: The advantages and capabilities of qualitative data analysis software are described and concerns about their effects on methods are discussed.
FINDINGS: Advantages of using qualitative data analysis software include being freed from manual and clerical tasks, saving time, being able to deal with large amounts of qualitative data, having increased flexibility, and having improved validity and auditability of qualitative research. Concerns include increasingly deterministic and rigid processes, privileging of coding, and retrieval methods; reification of data, increased pressure on researchers to focus on volume and breadth rather than on depth and meaning, time and energy spent learning to use computer packages, increased commercialism, and distraction from the real work of analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that researchers consider the capabilities of the package, their own computer literacy and knowledge of the package, or the time required to gain these skills, and the suitability of the package for their research. The intelligence and integrity that a researcher brings to the research process must also be brought to the choice and use of tools and analytical processes. Researchers should be as critical of the methodological approaches to using qualitative data analysis software as they are about the fit between research question, methods, and research design.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11140204     DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2000.00393.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh        ISSN: 1527-6546            Impact factor:   3.176


  9 in total

1.  Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience.

Authors:  Meryl Brod; Laura E Tesler; Torsten L Christensen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Commentary: Writing and Evaluating Qualitative Research Reports.

Authors:  Yelena P Wu; Deborah Thompson; Karen J Aroian; Elizabeth L McQuaid; Janet A Deatrick
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2016-04-26

3.  Short Take: Lowering the Access Barriers to Ethnographic Methodology.

Authors:  Tony V Pham
Journal:  Field methods       Date:  2020-11-04

4.  A practical guide for conducting qualitative research in medical education: Part 3-Using software for qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Samuel O Clarke; Wendy C Coates; Jaime Jordan
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2021-08-01

5.  Non-severe nocturnal hypoglycemic events: experience and impacts on patient functioning and well-being.

Authors:  Meryl Brod; Betsy Pohlman; Michael Wolden; Torsten Christensen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Registered nurses' experiences of patient violence on acute care psychiatric inpatient units: an interpretive descriptive study.

Authors:  Kelly N Stevenson; Susan M Jack; Linda O'Mara; Jeannette LeGris
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2015-05-17

7.  Using cognitive pre-testing methods in the development of a new evidenced-based pressure ulcer risk assessment instrument.

Authors:  S Coleman; J Nixon; J Keen; D Muir; L Wilson; E McGinnis; N Stubbs; C Dealey; E A Nelson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Barriers and facilitators to changes in adolescent physical activity during COVID-19.

Authors:  Kwok Ng; Jemima Cooper; Fiona McHale; Joanna Clifford; Catherine Woods
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2020-11-05

9.  Perspectives of older adults with a chronic condition on functioning, social participation and health: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Leen De Coninck; Anja Declercq; Leen Bouckaert; Mieke Vermandere; Maud J L Graff; Bert Aertgeert
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.921

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.