Literature DB >> 11139534

Controlling misdiagnosis errors in preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a comprehensive model encompassing extrinsic and intrinsic sources of error.

C M Lewis1, T Pinêl, J C Whittaker, A H Handyside.   

Abstract

We have developed a mathematical model to explore accuracy of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) using single cell polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The model encompasses both extrinsic technical errors and intrinsic errors related to nuclear and chromosomal abnormalities. Using estimates for these errors, we have calculated the probability of a serious error (affected embryo diagnosed as unaffected) using a variety of strategies designed to increase the accuracy of PGD. Additional information from genotyping a linked marker or a second biopsied cell reduces the probability of replacing an affected embryo, while ensuring that sufficient unaffected embryos can be replaced. For a recessive disease, two genotypes are required to ensure a low probability of replacing an affected embryo (<1%) with a high proportion of unaffected embryos eligible for replacement (68%). These genotypes may be from a single cell with linked marker, or disease genotypes from two cells. PGD of a dominant disease is more difficult, as it relies on the amplification of a single copy of the mutation. Genotypes from two biopsied cells are required to ensure that a high proportion of unaffected embryos are eligible for replacement. This model can be used as a clinical tool to prioritize embryos for transfer in a PGD cycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11139534     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.1.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  9 in total

Review 1.  Molecular diagnostics in preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Alan R Thornhill; Karen Snow
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.568

2.  Direct comparison of detection systems used for the development of single-cell genetic tests in preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  D L Blake; N L Dean; C Knight; S L Tan; A Ao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Unraveling preimplantation genetic diagnosis for high-risk couples: implications for nurses at the front line of care.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Catherine Schoenfeld; Ilan Tur-Kaspa
Journal:  Nurs Womens Health       Date:  2011 Feb-Mar

4.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of P450 oxidoreductase deficiency and Huntington Disease using three different molecular approaches simultaneously.

Authors:  Trinitat M Alberola; Rosa Bautista-Llácer; Esther Fernández; Xavier Vendrell; Manuel Pérez-Alonso
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Conceptualizing couples' decision making in PGD: emerging cognitive, emotional, and moral dimensions.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Penny F Pierce
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-01-08

6.  Expanding and Improving the Service for Testing Single Embryonic Cells by Preimplantation Genetic Haplotyping.

Authors:  Sara Ocaña López; Pamela Renwick
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2007-12-21

7.  The status of preimplantation genetic testing in the UK and USA.

Authors:  Rachel Theobald; Sioban SenGupta; Joyce Harper
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Patient education and informed consent for preimplantation genetic diagnosis: health literacy for genetics and assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Michelle L McGowan; Christopher J Burant; Rocio Moran; Ruth Farrell
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Pre-Implantation Gender Selection: Family Balancing in Jordan.

Authors:  Amer Mahmoud Sindiani; Faheem Zayed; Eman Hussein Alshdaifat; Hasan M Rawashdeh; Wesam Al-Woshah; Nada Zayed
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-07-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.