Literature DB >> 11138760

On the self-protective nature of inconsistency-negativity management: using the person memory paradigm to examine self-referent memory.

C Sedikides1, J D Green.   

Abstract

How do individuals remember feedback that is inconsistent or negative? According to the inconsistency-negativity resolution model, individuals are motivated to reduce uncertainty and resolve inconsistency even when threat to self is potential. They more deeply process and better remember negative self- than other-referent information. According to the inconsistency-negativity neglect model, individuals are motivated to protect the self against threat. They engage in more shallow processing and remember less negative self- than other-referent information. Participants read and recalled either self- or other-referent mixed-valence information. The neglect model was supported in personality and minimal feedback settings. A chronometric exploration of processing mechanisms and the ruling out of a retrieval interference account clarified aspects of the model. Individuals are hypersensitive to threat potential: They will protect the self against even hypothetical threat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11138760     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.6.906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  19 in total

1.  Better, Stronger, Faster: Self-Serving Judgment, Affect Regulation, and the Optimal Vigilance Hypothesis.

Authors:  Neal J Roese; James M Olson
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-06

Review 2.  The Social Psychology of Biased Self-Assessment.

Authors:  Samuel C Karpen
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Remembering moral and immoral actions in constructing the self.

Authors:  Matthew L Stanley; Paul Henne; Felipe De Brigard
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-04

4.  The neural correlates of positive self-evaluation and self-related memory.

Authors:  Katharina Pauly; Andreas Finkelmeyer; Frank Schneider; Ute Habel
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Source memory that encoding was self-referential: the influence of stimulus characteristics.

Authors:  Kelly A Durbin; Karen J Mitchell; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2017-02-08

6.  No evidence for unethical amnesia for imagined actions: A failed replication and extension.

Authors:  Matthew L Stanley; Brenda W Yang; Felipe De Brigard
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

7.  Similarity to the Self Affects Memory for Impressions of Others.

Authors:  Eric D Leshikar; Angela H Gutchess
Journal:  J Appl Res Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-11-11

8.  Alcohol primes, expectancies, and the working self-concept.

Authors:  Joshua A Hicks; Rebecca J Schlegel; Ronald S Friedman; Denis M McCarthy
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2009-09

9.  Similarity to the self influences cortical recruitment during impression formation.

Authors:  Eric D Leshikar; Brittany S Cassidy; Angela H Gutchess
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 10.  Neural mechanisms of motivated forgetting.

Authors:  Michael C Anderson; Simon Hanslmayr
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.