Literature DB >> 11138752

Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept.

A G Greenwald1, S D Farnham.   

Abstract

Experiment 1 used the Implicit Association Test (IAT; A. G. Greenwald, D. E. McGhee, & J. L. K. Schwartz, 1998) to measure self-esteem by assessing automatic associations of self with positive or negative valence. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that two IAT measures defined a factor that was distinct from, but weakly correlated with, a factor defined by standard explicit (self-report) measures of self-esteem. Experiment 2 tested known-groups validity of two IAT gender self-concept measures. Compared with well-established explicit measures, the IAT measures revealed triple the difference in measured masculinity-femininity between men and women. Again, CFA revealed construct divergence between implicit and explicit measures. Experiment 3 assessed the self-esteem IAT's validity in predicting cognitive reactions to success and failure. High implicit self-esteem was associated in the predicted fashion with buffering against adverse effects of failure on two of four measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11138752     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.6.1022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  100 in total

1.  Response Conflict and Affective Responses in the Control and Expression of Race Bias.

Authors:  Bruce D Bartholow; Erika A Henry
Journal:  Soc Personal Psychol Compass       Date:  2010-10

2.  Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation.

Authors:  Brian A Nosek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-11

3.  Defensive physiological reactions to rejection: the effect of self-esteem and attentional control on startle responses.

Authors:  Anett Gyurak; Ozlem Ayduk
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-10

4.  Evidence for implicit self-positivity bias: an event-related brain potential study.

Authors:  Yun Chen; Yiping Zhong; Haibo Zhou; Shanming Zhang; Qianbao Tan; Wei Fan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  An application of the LC-LSTM framework to the self-esteem instability case.

Authors:  Guido Alessandri; Michele Vecchione; Brent M Donnellan; John Tisak
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  Faulty assumptions: A comment on Blanton, Jaccard, Gonzales, and Christie (2006).

Authors:  Brian A Nosek; N Sriram
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-05

7.  Implicit orientation toward family and school among bilingual Latino college students.

Authors:  Thierry Devos; Karla Blanco; Cynthia Muñoz; Roger Dunn; Emilio C Ulloa
Journal:  J Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-08

8.  Psychological and Biological Validation of a Novel Digital Social Peer Evaluation Experiment (digi-SPEE).

Authors:  Claudia Menne-Lothmann; Jeroen Decoster; Ruud van Winkel; Dina Collip; Bart P F Rutten; Philippe Delespaul; Marc De Hert; Catherine Derom; Evert Thiery; Nele Jacobs; Jim van Os; Marieke Wichers
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 1.339

9.  Using the EZ-Diffusion Model to Score a Single-Category Implicit Association Test of Physical Activity.

Authors:  Amanda L Rebar; Nilam Ram; David E Conroy
Journal:  Psychol Sport Exerc       Date:  2015-03-01

10.  Contextual blending of ingroup/outgroup face stimuli and word valence: LPP modulation and convergence of measures.

Authors:  Esteban Hurtado; Andrés Haye; Ramiro González; Facundo Manes; Agustiń Ibáñez
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.