M Slifstein1, M Laruelle. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Because of its computational simplicity, the graphic method introduced by Logan et al. is frequently used to analyze time-activity curves of reversible radiotracers measured in brain regions with PET. The graphic method uses a nonlinear transformation of data to variables that have an asymptotically linear relationship. Compared with compartmental analysis of untransformed data, the graphic method enables derivation of regional distribution volumes that are free from assumptions about the underlying compartmental configuration. In this article, we describe statistical bias associated with this nonlinear transformation method. METHODS: Theoretic analysis, Monte Carlo simulation, and statistical analysis of PET data were used to test the graphic method for bias. RESULTS: Mean zero noise is associated with underestimation of distribution volumes when data are analyzed with graphic analysis, whereas this effect does not occur when the same data are analyzed by nonlinear regression and compartmental analysis. Moreover, this effect depends on the magnitude of the distribution volume, so that the bias is more pronounced in regions with high receptor density than regions with low receptor density or no receptors (region of reference). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that conventional kinetic analysis of untransformed data is less sensitive to mean zero noise than is graphic analysis of nonlinearly transformed data.
UNLABELLED: Because of its computational simplicity, the graphic method introduced by Logan et al. is frequently used to analyze time-activity curves of reversible radiotracers measured in brain regions with PET. The graphic method uses a nonlinear transformation of data to variables that have an asymptotically linear relationship. Compared with compartmental analysis of untransformed data, the graphic method enables derivation of regional distribution volumes that are free from assumptions about the underlying compartmental configuration. In this article, we describe statistical bias associated with this nonlinear transformation method. METHODS: Theoretic analysis, Monte Carlo simulation, and statistical analysis of PET data were used to test the graphic method for bias. RESULTS: Mean zero noise is associated with underestimation of distribution volumes when data are analyzed with graphic analysis, whereas this effect does not occur when the same data are analyzed by nonlinear regression and compartmental analysis. Moreover, this effect depends on the magnitude of the distribution volume, so that the bias is more pronounced in regions with high receptor density than regions with low receptor density or no receptors (region of reference). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that conventional kinetic analysis of untransformed data is less sensitive to mean zero noise than is graphic analysis of nonlinearly transformed data.
Authors: Christine DeLorenzo; Matthew S Milak; Kathleen G Brennan; J S Dileep Kumar; J John Mann; Ramin V Parsey Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-01-29 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: John M Floberg; Charles A Mistretta; Jamey P Weichert; Lance T Hall; James E Holden; Bradley T Christian Journal: Med Phys Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Rachel M Bartlett; Onofre T Dejesus; Todd E Barnhart; R Jerome Nickles; Bradley T Christian; John L Graner; James E Holden Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2010-06-09 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Marc D Normandin; Ming-Qiang Zheng; Kuo-Shyan Lin; N Scott Mason; Shu-Fei Lin; Jim Ropchan; David Labaree; Shannan Henry; Wendol A Williams; Richard E Carson; Alexander Neumeister; Yiyun Huang Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Yabo Fu; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Jonathon A Nye; Xiaofeng Yang Journal: Phys Med Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 2.685
Authors: M Reimold; W Mueller-Schauenburg; G A Becker; G Reischl; B M Dohmen; R Bares Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2003-12-19 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Andrea Kobiella; Sabine Vollstädt-Klein; Mira Bühler; Caroline Graf; Hans-Georg Buchholz; Nina Bernow; Igor Y Yakushev; Christian Landvogt; Mathias Schreckenberger; Gerhard Gründer; Peter Bartenstein; Christoph Fehr; Michael N Smolka Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 5.038