Literature DB >> 11138660

A school-based strategy to assess children's environmental exposures and related health effects in economically disadvantaged urban neighborhoods.

K Sexton1, I A Greaves, T R Church, J L Adgate, G Ramachandran, R L Tweedie, A Fredrickson, M Geisser, M Sikorski, G Fischer, D Jones, P Ellringer.   

Abstract

The School Health Initiative: Environment, Learning, Disease (SHIELD) study is a novel school-based investigation of children's environmental health in economically disadvantaged urban neighborhoods of Minneapolis. This article describes the study design and summarizes lessons learned about recruiting and monitoring this historically understudied population. The SHIELD study focused on measuring children's exposures to multiple environmental stressors [volatile organic chemicals (VOCs), environmental tobacco smoke, allergens, bioaerosols, metals, pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB), phthalates] and exploring related effects on respiratory health (e.g., lung function) and learning outcomes (e.g., standardized test scores, academic achievement). It involved intensive exposure monitoring, including environmental measurements inside and outside the children's schools and inside their homes, personal measurements with passive dosimeters worn by the children, and biological marker measurements in blood and urine. The SHIELD participants comprised a stratified random sample of 153 "index" children and 51 of their siblings enrolled in grades 2-5 at two adjacent elementary schools. The Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) assisted with identifying, contacting, recruiting, and monitoring this population, which traditionally is difficult to study because families/children are highly mobile, speak a diversity of languages, frequently do not have a telephone, endure economic hardships, often do not trust researchers, and have a spectrum of unconventional lifestyles and living arrangements. Using a school-based approach, the overall SHIELD enrollment (response) rate was 56.7%, with a wide disparity between English-speaking (41.7%) and non-English-speaking (71.0%) families/children. Most children remained involved in the study through both monitoring sessions and exhibited an acceptable degree of compliance with study protocols, including providing blood and urine samples. Results indicate that it is both practical and affordable to conduct probability-based exposure studies in this population, but that it is also important to improve our understanding of factors (e.g., cultural, economic, psychological, social) affecting the willingness of families/children to participate in such studies, with special emphasis on developing cost-effective recruitment methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11138660     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1053-4245


  8 in total

1.  Issues in design and implementation in an urban birth cohort study: the Syracuse AUDIT project.

Authors:  Judith A Crawford; Teresa M Hargrave; Andrew Hunt; Chien-Chih Liu; Ran D Anbar; Geralyn E Hall; Deepa Naishadham; Maria H Czerwinski; Noah Webster; Sandra D Lane; Jerrold L Abraham
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: using diverse exposure metrics to document ethnic/racial differences.

Authors:  Ken Sexton; John L Adgate; Timothy R Church; Stephen S Hecht; Gurumurthy Ramachandran; Ian A Greaves; Ann L Fredrickson; Andrew D Ryan; Steven G Carmella; Mindy S Geisser
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  Children's exposure to volatile organic compounds as determined by longitudinal measurements in blood.

Authors:  Ken Sexton; John L Adgate; Timothy R Church; David L Ashley; Larry L Needham; Gurumurthy Ramachandran; Ann L Fredrickson; Andrew D Ryan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Outdoor, indoor, and personal exposure to VOCs in children.

Authors:  John L Adgate; Timothy R Church; Andrew D Ryan; Gurumurthy Ramachandran; Ann L Fredrickson; Thomas H Stock; Maria T Morandi; Ken Sexton
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  Current state of the science: health effects and indoor environmental quality.

Authors:  Clifford S Mitchell; Junfeng Jim Zhang; Torben Sigsgaard; Matti Jantunen; Paul J Lioy; Robert Samson; Meryl H Karol
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Recruitment, retention, and compliance results from a probability study of children's environmental health in economically disadvantaged neighborhoods.

Authors:  Ken Sexton; John L Adgate; Timothy R Church; Ian A Greaves; Gurumurthy Ramachandran; Ann L Fredrickson; Mindy S Geisser; Andrew D Ryan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Relationship of serum TCDD concentrations and age at exposure of female residents of Seveso, Italy.

Authors:  Brenda Eskenazi; Paolo Mocarelli; Marcella Warner; Larry Needham; Donald G Patterson; Steven Samuels; Wayman Turner; Pier Mario Gerthoux; Paolo Brambilla
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Child diet and health outcomes of the simple suppers program: a 10-week, 2-group quasi-experimental family meals trial.

Authors:  Carolyn Gunther; Catherine Rogers; Christopher Holloman; Laura C Hopkins; Sarah E Anderson; Carla K Miller; Kristen A Copeland; Jamie S Dollahite; Keeley J Pratt; Alison Webster; Allison N Labyk; Christine Penicka
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.295

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.