Literature DB >> 11138579

Mechanomyographic and electromyographic responses during submaximal cycle ergometry.

T J Housh1, S R Perry, A J Bull, G O Johnson, K T Ebersole, D J Housh, H A deVries.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the mechanomyographic (MMG) and electromyographic (EMG) responses during continuous, cycle ergometer workbouts performed at constant power outputs. Eight adults [mean (SD) age, 21.5 (1.6) years] volunteered to perform an incremental test to exhaustion for the determination of peak power (Wpeak) and four, 15-min (or to exhaustion) rides at constant power outputs of 50%, 65%, 80%, and 95% Wpeak. Piezoelectric crystal contact sensors were placed on the vastus lateralis (VL) and vastus medialis (VM) muscles to record the MMG signals. Bipolar surface electrode arrangements were placed on the VL and VM to record the EMG signals. Five-second samples of the MMG and EMG signals were recorded every 30 s at power outputs of 50%, 65%, and 80% Wpeak, and every 15 s at 95% Wpeak. The amplitudes of the selected portions of the signals were normalized to the first values recorded during the continuous rides, and regression analyses were used to determine whether the slope coefficients for the MMG and EMG versus time relationships were significantly (P < 0.05) different from zero. The results indicate that EMG amplitude increased (range of slope coefficients: 0.03-0.56) during the continuous rides for both muscles at all four power outputs (except the VM at 50% Wpeak), while MMG amplitude increased (slope coefficient at 95% Wpeak for VM = 0.19), decreased (range of slope coefficients for VL and VM at 50% and 65% Wpeak = -0.14 to -0.24), or remained unchanged (range of slope coefficients for VL and VM at 80% Wpeak and VL at 95% peak = -0.06 to 0.12) depending on the power output. The patterns of the MMG responses, however, were similar for the VL and VM muscles, except at 95% Wpeak. Fatigue-induced changes in motor-unit recruitment and discharge rates, or muscular compliance may explain the differences between power outputs in the patterns of the MMG amplitude responses.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11138579     DOI: 10.1007/s004210000315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  11 in total

1.  Mechanomyographic and electromyographic time and frequency domain responses during submaximal to maximal isokinetic muscle actions of the biceps brachii.

Authors:  Travis W Beck; Terry J Housh; Glen O Johnson; Joseph P Weir; Joel T Cramer; Jared W Coburn; Moh H Malek
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Muscle coordination limits efficiency and power output of human limb movement under a wide range of mechanical demands.

Authors:  Ollie M Blake; James M Wakeling
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Mechanomyographic responses in quadriceps muscles during fatigue by continuous cycle exercise.

Authors:  Tetsuya Kimura; Mami Fujibayashi; Seitaro Tanaka; Toshio Moritani
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Factors underlying the perception of effort during constant heart rate running above and below the critical heart rate.

Authors:  Haley C Bergstrom; Terry J Housh; Kristen C Cochrane; Nathaniel D M Jenkins; Jorge M Zuniga; Samuel L Buckner; Jacob A Goldsmith; Richard J Schmidt; Glen O Johnson; Joel T Cramer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  Cerebral changes during exercise in the heat.

Authors:  Bodil Nielsen; Lars Nybo
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Inter-individual variability in the patterns of responses for electromyography and mechanomyography during cycle ergometry using an RPE-clamp model.

Authors:  Kristen C Cochrane-Snyman; Terry J Housh; Cory M Smith; Ethan C Hill; Nathaniel D M Jenkins; Richard J Schmidt; Glen O Johnson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  Peripheral fatigue: new mechanistic insights from recent technologies.

Authors:  Emiliano Cè; Stefano Longo; Eloisa Limonta; Giuseppe Coratella; Susanna Rampichini; Fabio Esposito
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 8.  Mechanomyographic amplitude and frequency responses during dynamic muscle actions: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Travis W Beck; Terry J Housh; Joel T Cramer; Joseph P Weir; Glen O Johnson; Jared W Coburn; Moh H Malek; Michelle Mielke
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Mechanomyographic responses for the biceps brachii are associated with failure times during isometric force tasks.

Authors:  Joshua C Carr; Travis W Beck; Xin Ye; Nathan P Wages
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2018-02

10.  Neuromuscular responses of the superficial quadriceps femoris muscles: muscle specific fatigue and inter-individual variability during severe intensity treadmill running.

Authors:  Haley C Bergstrom; Terry J Housh; Taylor K Dinyer; Travis M Byrd; Nathaniel D M Jenkins; Kristen C Cochrane-Snyman; Pasquale J Succi; Richard J Schmidt; Glen O Johnson; Jorge M Zuniga
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 2.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.