Literature DB >> 11138298

Atrioventricular interval optimization in the right atrial appendage and interatrial septum pacing: a comparison between echo and peak endocardial acceleration measurements.

L Padeletti1, M C Porciani, P Ritter, A Michelucci, A Colella, P Pieragnoli, A Costoli, C Ciapetti, A Sabini, G Demarchi, L Gillio-Meina, G Gaggini, G F Gensini.   

Abstract

Interatrial septum pacing (IASP) reduces interatrial conduction time and consequently may interfere with atrioventricular delay (AVD) optimization. We studied 14 patients with an implanted BEST Living system device able to measure peak endocardial acceleration (PEA) signal. The aims of our study were to compare the (1) optimal AVD (OAVD) in right atrial appendage pacing (RAAP) and IASP, and (2) OAVD derived by the PEA signal versus OAVD derived by Echo/Doppler evaluation of the left ventricular filling time (LVFT) and cardiac output (CO). Measurements were performed in DDD VDD modes Eight patients (group A) had RAAP and six patients (group B) had IASP. In group A, OAVD measured by LVFT, CO, and PEA was 185 +/- 23 ms, 177 +/- 19 ms, and 192 +/- 23 ms in DDD and 147 +/- 19 ms, 135 +/- 27 ms, and 146 +/- 20 ms in VDD, respectively. OAVD measured by LVFT, CO, and PEA was significantly longer in DDD mode than in VDD (P < 0.01, P < 0.01, P < 0.001). In group B, OAVD measured by LVFT, CO, and PEA was 116 +/- 19 ms, 113 +/- 10 ms, and 130 +/- 30 ms in DDD and 106 +/- 16 ms, 96 +/- 15 ms, and 108 +/- 26 ms in VDD, respectively. No statistical differences were observed between DDD and VDD. Significant correlations between OAVDs PEA derived and OAVDs LVFT and CO derived were observed (r = 0.71, r = 0.69, respectively). When new techniques of atrial stimulation, as IASP, are used an OAVD shorter and similar in VDD and DDD has to be considered. The BEST Living system could provide a valid method to ensure, in every moment, the exact required OAVD to maximize atrial contribution to CO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11138298     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2000.01618.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

1.  The search for optimal atrioventricular interval.

Authors:  I Eli Ovsyshcher
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Current concepts in pacing 2010-2011: the right and wrong way to pace.

Authors:  Simon Modi; Andrew Krahn; Raymond Yee
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2011-10

3.  Usefulness of hemodynamic sensors for physiologic cardiac pacing in heart failure patients.

Authors:  Eraldo Occhetta; Miriam Bortnik; Paolo Marino
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 1.866

4.  Impact of acute changes of left ventricular contractility on the transvalvular impedance: validation study by pressure-volume loop analysis in healthy pigs.

Authors:  Vincenzo Lionetti; Simone Lorenzo Romano; Giacomo Bianchi; Fabio Bernini; Anar Dushpanova; Giuseppe Mascia; Martina Nesti; Franco Di Gregorio; Alberto Barbetta; Luigi Padeletti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Heart failure monitoring with a cardiac resynchronization therapy device-based cardiac contractility sensor: a case series.

Authors:  Jacques Mansourati; Mélanie Heurteau; Jérôme Abaléa
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2014-01-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.