Literature DB >> 11137256

A mucosal vaccine against diphtheria: formulation of cross reacting material (CRM(197)) of diphtheria toxin with chitosan enhances local and systemic antibody and Th2 responses following nasal delivery.

E A McNeela1, D O'Connor, I Jabbal-Gill, L Illum, S S Davis, M Pizza, S Peppoloni, R Rappuoli, K H Mills.   

Abstract

The development of new generation vaccines against diphtheria is dependent on the identification of antigens and routes of immunization that are capable of stimulating immune responses similar to, or greater than, those obtained with the parenterally-delivered toxoid vaccine, while reducing the adverse effects that have been associated with the traditional vaccine. In this study, we examined the cellular and humoral immune responses in mice generated after both parenteral and mucosal immunizations with cross-reacting material (CRM(197)) of diphtheria toxin. We found that both native and mildly formaldehyde-treated CRM(197) and conventional diphtheria toxoid (DT) induced mixed Th1/Th2 responses and similar levels of anti-DT serum IgG following parenteral immunization. In contrast, CRM(197) preparations were poorly immunogenic when administered intranasally in solution. However, formulation of the antigens with chitosan significantly enhanced their immunogenicity, inducing high levels of antigen-specific IgG, secretory IgA, toxin-neutralizing antibodies and T cell responses, predominately of Th2 subtype. Furthermore, intranasal immunization with CRM(197) and chitosan induced protective antibodies against the toxin in a guinea pig passive challenge model. We also found that priming parenterally with DT in alum and boosting intranasally with CRM(197) was a very effective method of immunization in mice, capable of inducing high levels of anti-DT IgG and neutralizing antibodies in the serum and secretory IgA in the respiratory tract. Our findings suggest that boosting intranasally with CRM(197) antigen may be very effective in adolescents or adults who have previously been parenterally immunized with a conventional diphtheria toxoid vaccine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11137256     DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(00)00309-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  24 in total

1.  Protective levels of diphtheria-neutralizing antibody induced in healthy volunteers by unilateral priming-boosting intranasal immunization associated with restricted ipsilateral mucosal secretory immunoglobulin a.

Authors:  Kingston H G Mills; Catherine Cosgrove; Edel A McNeela; Amy Sexton; Rafaela Giemza; Inderjit Jabbal-Gill; Anne Church; Wu Lin; Lisbeth Illum; Audino Podda; Rino Rappuoli; Mariagrazia Pizza; George E Griffin; David J M Lewis
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 2.  Absorption enhancers for nasal drug delivery.

Authors:  Stanley S Davis; Lisbeth Illum
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Pulmonary immunization of guinea pigs with diphtheria CRM-197 antigen as nanoparticle aggregate dry powders enhance local and systemic immune responses.

Authors:  Pavan Muttil; Brian Pulliam; Lucila Garcia-Contreras; John Kevin Fallon; Chenchen Wang; Anthony James Hickey; David A Edwards
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Th immune response induced by H pylori vaccine with chitosan as adjuvant and its relation to immune protection.

Authors:  Yong Xie; Nan-Jin Zhou; Yan-Feng Gong; Xiao-Jiang Zhou; Jiang Chen; Si-Juan Hu; Nong-Hua Lu; Xiao-Hua Hou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Transcutaneous immunization with cross-reacting material CRM(197) of diphtheria toxin boosts functional antibody levels in mice primed parenterally with adsorbed diphtheria toxoid vaccine.

Authors:  Paul Stickings; Marisa Peyre; Laura Coombes; Sylviane Muller; Rino Rappuoli; Giuseppe Del Giudice; Charalambos D Partidos; Dorothea Sesardic
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 6.  Chitosan: a promising safe and immune-enhancing adjuvant for intranasal vaccines.

Authors:  Alan Smith; Michael Perelman; Michael Hinchcliffe
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Induction of protective serum meningococcal bactericidal and diphtheria-neutralizing antibodies and mucosal immunoglobulin A in volunteers by nasal insufflations of the Neisseria meningitidis serogroup C polysaccharide-CRM197 conjugate vaccine mixed with chitosan.

Authors:  Zhiming Huo; Ruchi Sinha; Edel A McNeela; Ray Borrow; Rafaela Giemza; Catherine Cosgrove; Paul T Heath; Kingston H G Mills; Rino Rappuoli; George E Griffin; David J M Lewis
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Chitin and Chitosan: Production and Application of Versatile Biomedical Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Daniel Elieh-Ali-Komi; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Int J Adv Res (Indore)       Date:  2016-03-01

9.  CriticalSorb™: enabling systemic delivery of macromolecules via the nasal route.

Authors:  Andrew L Lewis; Faron Jordan; Lisbeth Illum
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.617

10.  Intranasal immunization with chitosan/pCAGGS-flaA nanoparticles inhibits Campylobacter jejuni in a White Leghorn model.

Authors:  Jin-lin Huang; Yan-Xin Yin; Zhi-ming Pan; Gong Zhang; Ai-ping Zhu; Xiu-fan Liu; Xin-an Jiao
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-08-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.