BACKGROUND: QT dispersion has been considered a surrogate for heterogeneity of repolarization, leading to ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS: High-resolution 12-lead electrocardiograms were obtained in 15 patients with a history of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation, 15 patients with congestive heart failure, 17 patients with a history of previous Q-wave myocardial infarction without heart failure, and 23 healthy control subjects. RESULTS: QTc dispersion was prolonged in all 3 patient groups compared with controls (71+/-22, 68 +/-31, 61+/-27 vs 44+/-17 msec, P =. 003), but no difference was seen between heart disease groups. QTc dispersion was strongly correlated with the QTc max (r = 0.73, P<.0001) but did not correlate with the QTc min (r = 0.04, P =.76). QTc dispersion also strongly correlated with the JTc max (r = 0.54, P<.0001) but did not correlate with JTc min (r = -0.007, P =.95). QTc dispersion correlated inversely with T-wave amplitude (r = -0.35, P =.003). When all 876 electrocardiographic signals were considered, a significant negative correlation was present between QTc duration and T-wave amplitude (r = -0.133, P =.0002). Logistic regression analysis failed to demonstrate any independent risk factors that predicted ventricular arrhythmias, including all measures of dispersion. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of QT dispersion is strongly influenced by the maximum QT interval, as well as by changes in T-wave amplitude. QT "dispersion" may represent a summary of these changes that reflect the underlying myocardial process but does not represent an accurate quantitative measure of heterogeneity of refractoriness.
BACKGROUND: QT dispersion has been considered a surrogate for heterogeneity of repolarization, leading to ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS: High-resolution 12-lead electrocardiograms were obtained in 15 patients with a history of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation, 15 patients with congestive heart failure, 17 patients with a history of previous Q-wave myocardial infarction without heart failure, and 23 healthy control subjects. RESULTS:QTc dispersion was prolonged in all 3 patient groups compared with controls (71+/-22, 68 +/-31, 61+/-27 vs 44+/-17 msec, P =. 003), but no difference was seen between heart disease groups. QTc dispersion was strongly correlated with the QTc max (r = 0.73, P<.0001) but did not correlate with the QTc min (r = 0.04, P =.76). QTc dispersion also strongly correlated with the JTc max (r = 0.54, P<.0001) but did not correlate with JTc min (r = -0.007, P =.95). QTc dispersion correlated inversely with T-wave amplitude (r = -0.35, P =.003). When all 876 electrocardiographic signals were considered, a significant negative correlation was present between QTc duration and T-wave amplitude (r = -0.133, P =.0002). Logistic regression analysis failed to demonstrate any independent risk factors that predicted ventricular arrhythmias, including all measures of dispersion. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of QT dispersion is strongly influenced by the maximum QT interval, as well as by changes in T-wave amplitude. QT "dispersion" may represent a summary of these changes that reflect the underlying myocardial process but does not represent an accurate quantitative measure of heterogeneity of refractoriness.
Authors: Gunnar Erikssen; Knut Liestøl; Lars Gullestad; Kristina H Haugaa; Bjørn Bendz; Jan P Amlie Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Fabrizio De Ponti; Elisabetta Poluzzi; Andrea Cavalli; Maurizio Recanatini; Nicola Montanaro Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2002 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Milos Kesek; Anders Englund; Tomas Jernberg; Bo Lagerqvist; Bertil Lindahl Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 1.468