Literature DB >> 11136265

Outcome of myocardial infarction in Veterans Health Administration patients as compared with medicare patients.

L A Petersen1, S L Normand, J Daley, B J McNeil.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some have the opinion that patients cared for in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hospitals receive care of poorer quality than those cared for in non-VHA institutions. To assess the quality of care in VHA hospitals, we compared the outcome of acute myocardial infarction among patients in VHA and non-VHA institutions while controlling for potential confounders, including coexisting conditions and severity of illness.
METHODS: We studied 2486 veterans discharged from 81 VHA hospitals and 29,249 Medicare patients discharged from 1530 non-VHA hospitals, restricting our samples to men at least 65 years of age who were discharged with confirmed acute myocardial infarction. We compared coexisting conditions, severity of illness, and 30-day and 1-year mortality in the two samples.
RESULTS: VHA patients were significantly more likely than Medicare patients to have a recorded history of hypertension (64.3 percent vs. 57.3 percent), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma (30.9 percent vs. 23.5 percent), diabetes (34.8 percent vs. 29.0 percent), stroke (20.4 percent vs. 14.2 percent), or dementia (7.2 percent vs. 4.8 percent) (P<0.001 for all comparisons). According to both multivariate logistic regression and an analysis using 2265 matched pairs of VHA and Medicare patients, there were no significant differences in 30-day or 1-year mortality. The matched-pairs analysis found that the difference in mortality at 30 days (the mortality rate among Medicare patients minus the mortality rate among VHA patients), averaged over the 5-year age groups, was -0.8 percent (95 percent confidence interval, -2.8 percent to 1.3 percent), and the difference in mortality at 1 year was -1.3 percent (95 percent confidence interval, -3.9 percent to 1.3 percent).
CONCLUSIONS: VHA patients had more coexisting conditions than Medicare patients. Nevertheless, we found no significant difference in mortality between VHA and Medicare patients, a result that suggests a similar quality of care for acute myocardial infarction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11136265     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200012283432606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  33 in total

1.  Measuring the quality of the VA Health Care System.

Authors:  Paul A Heidenreich
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methods.

Authors:  Til Stürmer; Manisha Joshi; Robert J Glynn; Jerry Avorn; Kenneth J Rothman; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Use of preventive care by elderly male veterans receiving care through the Veterans Health Administration, Medicare fee-for-service, and Medicare HMO plans.

Authors:  Salomeh Keyhani; Joseph S Ross; Paul Hebert; Cornelia Dellenbaugh; Joan D Penrod; Albert L Siu
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Lack of health coverage among US veterans from 1987 to 2004.

Authors:  David U Himmelstein; Karen E Lasser; Danny McCormick; David H Bor; J Wesley Boyd; Steffie Woolhandler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Change in health status and mortality as indicators of outcomes: comparison between the Medicare Advantage Program and the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Alfredo J Selim; Lewis E Kazis; William Rogers; Shirley X Qian; James A Rothendler; Avron Spiro; Xinhua S Ren; Donald Miller; Bernardo J Selim; Benjamin G Fincke
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Risk stratification for death and all-cause hospitalization in heart failure clinic outpatients.

Authors:  Scott L Hummel; Hussam H Ghalib; David Ratz; Todd M Koelling
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Variation in use of echocardiography among veterans who use the Veterans Health Administration vs Medicare.

Authors:  Vinay Kini; Fenton H McCarthy; Sheeva Rajaei; Andrew J Epstein; Paul A Heidenreich; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Fee-based care is important for access to prompt treatment of hip fractures among veterans.

Authors:  Kelly K Richardson; Peter Cram; Mary Vaughan-Sarrazin; Peter J Kaboli
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Characteristics and outcomes of patients with advanced chronic systolic heart failure receiving care at the Veterans Affairs versus other hospitals: insights from the Beta-blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial (BEST).

Authors:  Linda G Jones; Mo-Kyung Sin; Fadi G Hage; Raya E Kheirbek; Charity J Morgan; Michael R Zile; Wen-Chih Wu; Prakash Deedwania; Gregg C Fonarow; Wilbert S Aronow; Sumanth D Prabhu; Ross D Fletcher; Ali Ahmed; Richard M Allman
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 8.790

10.  Comparison of health outcomes for male seniors in the Veterans Health Administration and Medicare Advantage plans.

Authors:  Alfredo J Selim; Dan Berlowitz; Lewis E Kazis; William Rogers; Steven M Wright; Shirley X Qian; James A Rothendler; Avron Spiro; Donald Miller; Bernardo J Selim; Benjamin G Fincke
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.