Literature DB >> 11136145

Impact of ambulance diversion policies in urban, suburban, and rural areas of Central Maryland.

J J Scheulen1, G Li, G D Kelen.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: As a method to control patient flow to overburdened hospitals, effective emergency medical services (EMS) systems provide policies for ambulance diversion. The Maryland state EMS system supports two types of alert for general hospital use: red alert, aimed at limiting the delivery of patients who may require intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and yellow alert, aimed at preventing further overload of already overtaxed emergency departments (EDs).
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of those alert policies in different geographical environments, urban, suburban, and rural.
METHODS: Alert data for 23 hospitals in Central Maryland and ambulance arrival data for approximately 138,000 ambulance calls during calendar year 1996 were combined and analyzed. The impacts of diversion practices in the geographic areas were compared.
RESULTS: Red alert reduced volume in all patient acuity levels in all geographic areas by a statistically significant 0.4 patient/hr. Yellow alert diverted low-acuity patients at the rate of 0.13 patient/hr (p<0.001) in urban areas and at the rate of 0.16 patient/hr (p<0.001) in suburban areas, but had minimal impact in the flow of patients in the rural environment.
CONCLUSIONS: The ED diversion policy has some limited effect in preventing further patient volume in urban and suburban areas, but has virtually no impact in rural areas. However, an ICU diversion policy diverts patients of all acuities uniformly and inordinately diverts patients not likely to require ICU admissions while having only minimal impact on patients who do require ICU resources. The impact of red alert is uniform in all geographic areas. The impact and efficacy of ambulance diversion policies should be evaluated to ensure they are having the intended effect. While perhaps initially effective, the impact of alert policies may change over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11136145     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb00546.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  5 in total

Review 1.  A review on ambulance offload delay literature.

Authors:  Mengyu Li; Peter Vanberkel; Alix J E Carter
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2018-07-07

2.  An Electronic Dashboard to Monitor Patient Flow at the Johns Hopkins Hospital: Communication of Key Performance Indicators Using the Donabedian Model.

Authors:  Diego A Martinez; Erin M Kane; Mehdi Jalalpour; James Scheulen; Hetal Rupani; Rohit Toteja; Charles Barbara; Bree Bush; Scott R Levin
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 3.  Systematic review of emergency department crowding: causes, effects, and solutions.

Authors:  Nathan R Hoot; Dominik Aronsky
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 5.721

4.  Sustaining critical care: using evidence-based simulation to evaluate ICU management policies.

Authors:  Amin Mahmoudian-Dehkordi; Somayeh Sadat
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2016-05-23

5.  The Impact of Ambulance and Patient Diversion on Crowdedness of Multiple Emergency Departments in a Region.

Authors:  Chung-Yao Kao; Jhen-Ci Yang; Chih-Hao Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.