Literature DB >> 11135349

Design evaluation for a population pharmacokinetic study using clinical trial simulations: a case study.

K G Kowalski1, M M Hutmacher.   

Abstract

Clinical trial simulations were conducted to assess power and sample size requirements for a population pharmacokinetic (PK) substudy of a phase III clinical trial. The simulations were based on a population PK model developed from phase I healthy volunteer data. A sparse sampling design was employed taking into account the practical considerations regarding the desire not to keep patients at the study sites for extended periods of time for blood sampling. It was expected that the sparse sampling design would not support fitting the same model developed in healthy volunteers due to the narrow range of sampling times. Therefore, a model with fewer parameters and variance components was fit to simulated data from the proposed design to assess the bias in the estimates of the population mean PK parameters and variance components. Results indicate that the proposed design employing the simple model can provide accurate mean estimates of oral drug clearance (CL) and the apparent steady-state volume of distribution (V(ss)). However, the simulation results also suggest that the size and power of the likelihood ratio test for subpopulation differences in CL are inflated when using the simple model. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11135349     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0258(20010115)20:1<75::aid-sim602>3.0.co;2-c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  16 in total

1.  From adults to children: simulation-based choice of an appropriate sparse-sampling schedule.

Authors:  Stefanie Reif; Marcus Schultze-Mosgau; Gabriele Sutter
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic guided trial design in oncology.

Authors:  Ch van Kesteren; R A A Mathôt; J H Beijnen; J H M Schellens
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Design of pharmacokinetic studies for latent covariates.

Authors:  Chakradhar V Lagishetty; Carolyn V Coulter; Stephen B Duffull
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 2.745

4.  Rapid sample size calculations for a defined likelihood ratio test-based power in mixed-effects models.

Authors:  Camille Vong; Martin Bergstrand; Joakim Nyberg; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 5.  Methods and strategies for assessing uncontrolled drug-drug interactions in population pharmacokinetic analyses: results from the International Society of Pharmacometrics (ISOP) Working Group.

Authors:  Peter L Bonate; Malidi Ahamadi; Nageshwar Budha; Amparo de la Peña; Justin C Earp; Ying Hong; Mats O Karlsson; Patanjali Ravva; Ana Ruiz-Garcia; Herbert Struemper; Janet R Wade
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 6.  Recommended reading in population pharmacokinetic pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Peter L Bonate
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  Population pharmacokinetics of sirolimus in de novo Chinese adult renal transplant patients.

Authors:  Zheng Jiao; Xiao-jin Shi; Zhong-dong Li; Ming-kang Zhong
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Evaluation of Approaches to Deal with Low-Frequency Nuisance Covariates in Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses.

Authors:  Chakradhar V Lagishetty; Stephen B Duffull
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 9.  Covariate selection in pharmacometric analyses: a review of methods.

Authors:  Matthew M Hutmacher; Kenneth G Kowalski
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Simulation of correlated continuous and categorical variables using a single multivariate distribution.

Authors:  Stacey J Tannenbaum; Nicholas H G Holford; Howard Lee; Carl C Peck; Diane R Mould
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 2.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.