Literature DB >> 11134630

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated synaptic potentials in rat neocortex.

Z G Chu1, F M Zhou, J J Hablitz.   

Abstract

In the neocortex, fast excitatory synaptic transmission can typically be blocked by using excitatory amino acid (EAA) receptor antagonists. In recordings from layer II/III neocortical pyramidal neurons, we observed an evoked excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) or current (EPSC) in the presence of EAA receptor antagonists (40-100 microM D-APV+20 microM CNQX, or 5 mM kynurenic acid) plus the GABA(A)-receptor antagonist bicuculline (BIC, 20 microM). This EAA-antagonist resistant EPSC was observed in about 70% of neurons tested. It had a duration of approximately 20 ms and an amplitude of 61.5+/-6.8 pA at -70 mV (n=35). The EAA-antagonist resistant EPSC current-voltage relation was linear and reversed near 0 mV (n=23). The nonselective nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) antagonists dihydro-beta-erythroidine (DH beta E, 100 microM) or mecamylamine (50 microM) reduced EPSC amplitudes by 42 (n=20) and 33% (n=9), respectively. EPSC kinetics were not significantly changed by either antagonist. Bath application of 10 microM neostigmine, a potent acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, prolonged the EPSC decay time. EAA-antagonist resistant EPSCs were observed in the presence of antagonists of metabotropic glutamate, serotonergic (5-HT(3)) and purinergic (P2) receptors. The EAA-antagonist resistant EPSC appears to be due in part to activation of postsynaptic nAChRs. These results suggest the existence of functional synaptic nAChRs on pyramidal neurons in rat neocortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11134630     DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)03076-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  15 in total

1.  Coantagonism of glutamate receptors and nicotinic acetylcholinergic receptors disrupts fear conditioning and latent inhibition of fear conditioning.

Authors:  Thomas J Gould; Michael C Lewis
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 2.  Nicotine and hippocampus-dependent learning: implications for addiction.

Authors:  Thomas J Gould
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.590

3.  Acetylcholine excites neocortical pyramidal neurons via nicotinic receptors.

Authors:  Tristan Hedrick; Jack Waters
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Modulation of high- and low-frequency components of the cortical local field potential via nicotinic and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in anesthetized mice.

Authors:  Abigail Kalmbach; Jack Waters
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Selective optogenetic stimulation of cholinergic axons in neocortex.

Authors:  Abigail Kalmbach; Tristan Hedrick; Jack Waters
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Post- and prejunctional consequences of ecto-ATPase inhibition: electrical and contractile studies in guinea-pig vas deferens.

Authors:  P Ghildyal; D Palani; R Manchanda
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Ultrastructural distribution of the alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit in rat hippocampus.

Authors:  R Fabian-Fine; P Skehel; M L Errington; H A Davies; E Sher; M G Stewart; A Fine
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Muscarinic receptors regulate auditory and prefrontal cortical communication during auditory processing.

Authors:  Nicholas M James; Howard J Gritton; Nancy Kopell; Kamal Sen; Xue Han
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 5.250

9.  Alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors occur at postsynaptic densities of AMPA receptor-positive and -negative excitatory synapses in rat sensory cortex.

Authors:  Robert B Levy; Chiye Aoki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Membranes with the same ion channel populations but different excitabilities.

Authors:  Marco Arieli Herrera-Valdez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.