PURPOSE: To summarize evidence on the costs of treating patients in clinical trials and to describe the Cost of Cancer Treatment Study, an ongoing effort to produce generalizable estimates of the incremental costs of government-sponsored cancer trials. METHODS: A retrospective study of costs will be conducted with 1,500 cancer patients recruited from a randomly selected sample of institutions in the United States. Patients accrued to either phase II or phase III National Cancer Institute-sponsored clinical trials during a 15-month period will be asked to participate in a study of their health care utilization (n = 750). Costs will be measured approximately 1 year after their trial enrollment from a combination of billing records, medical records, and an in-person survey questionnaire. Similar data will be collected for a comparable group of cancer patients not in trials (n = 750) to provide an estimate of the incremental cost. RESULTS: Evidence suggests insurers limit access to trials because of cost concerns. Public and private efforts are underway to change these policies, but their permanent status is unclear. Previous studies found that treatment costs in clinical trials are similar to costs of standard therapy. However, it is difficult to generalize from these studies because of the unique practice settings, insufficient sample sizes, and the exclusion of potentially important costs. CONCLUSION: Denials of coverage for treatment in a clinical trial limit patient access to trials and could impede clinical research. Preliminary estimates suggest changes to these policies would not be expensive, but these results are not generalizable. The Cost of Cancer Treatment Study is an ongoing effort to provide generalizable estimates of the incremental treatment cost of phase II and phase III cancer trials. The results should be of great interest to insurers and the research community as they consider permanent ways to finance cancer trials.
PURPOSE: To summarize evidence on the costs of treating patients in clinical trials and to describe the Cost of Cancer Treatment Study, an ongoing effort to produce generalizable estimates of the incremental costs of government-sponsored cancer trials. METHODS: A retrospective study of costs will be conducted with 1,500 cancerpatients recruited from a randomly selected sample of institutions in the United States. Patients accrued to either phase II or phase III National Cancer Institute-sponsored clinical trials during a 15-month period will be asked to participate in a study of their health care utilization (n = 750). Costs will be measured approximately 1 year after their trial enrollment from a combination of billing records, medical records, and an in-person survey questionnaire. Similar data will be collected for a comparable group of cancerpatients not in trials (n = 750) to provide an estimate of the incremental cost. RESULTS: Evidence suggests insurers limit access to trials because of cost concerns. Public and private efforts are underway to change these policies, but their permanent status is unclear. Previous studies found that treatment costs in clinical trials are similar to costs of standard therapy. However, it is difficult to generalize from these studies because of the unique practice settings, insufficient sample sizes, and the exclusion of potentially important costs. CONCLUSION: Denials of coverage for treatment in a clinical trial limit patient access to trials and could impede clinical research. Preliminary estimates suggest changes to these policies would not be expensive, but these results are not generalizable. The Cost of Cancer Treatment Study is an ongoing effort to provide generalizable estimates of the incremental treatment cost of phase II and phase III cancer trials. The results should be of great interest to insurers and the research community as they consider permanent ways to finance cancer trials.
Authors: Michael J Hall; Brian Egleston; Suzanne M Miller; Joanne S Buzaglo; Jennifer Millard; Caroline Ridgway; Nevena Damjanov; John D Sprandio; Neal J Meropol Journal: Acta Oncol Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 4.089
Authors: Cristina Merkhofer; Shasank Chennupati; Qin Sun; Keith D Eaton; Renato G Martins; Scott D Ramsey; Bernardo H L Goulart Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2021-08
Authors: Kenneth L Kehl; Cheryl P Fullmer; Siqing Fu; Goldy C George; Kenneth R Hess; Filip Janku; Daniel D Karp; Shumei Kato; Cynthia K Kizer; Razelle Kurzrock; Aung Naing; Shubham Pant; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Vivek Subbiah; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; David S Hong Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Ryan D Nipp; Hang Lee; Elizabeth Powell; Nicole E Birrer; Emily Poles; Daniel Finkelstein; Karen Winkfield; Sanja Percac-Lima; Bruce Chabner; Beverly Moy Journal: Oncologist Date: 2016-03-14
Authors: S M Miller; S V Hudson; B L Egleston; S Manne; J S Buzaglo; K Devarajan; L Fleisher; J Millard; N Solarino; J Trinastic; N J Meropol Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Barbara S Craft; Razelle Kurzrock; Xiudong Lei; Roy Herbst; Scott Lippman; Siqing Fu; Daniel D Karp Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-04-15 Impact factor: 6.860