Literature DB >> 11133690

Direct exposure of chromosomes to nonactivated ovum cytoplasm is effective for bovine somatic cell nucleus reprogramming.

T Tani1, Y Kato, Y Tsunoda.   

Abstract

We examined the in vitro developmental potential of nonactivated and activated enucleated ova receiving cumulus cells at various stages of the cell cycle. Eleven to 29% of activated ova receiving donor cells stopped developing at the 8-cell stage but 21% to 50% of nonactivated ova receiving donor cells at either the G(0), G(1), G(2), or M phase, or cycling cells developed into blastocysts. One normal calf was born after transferring five blastocysts that had developed from ova receiving donor cells at the M phase. The present study demonstrated that direct exposure of donor chromosomes to nonactivated ovum cytoplasm is effective for somatic cell nucleus reprogramming, and activated ovum cytoplasm does not reprogram the nucleus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11133690     DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod64.1.324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Reprod        ISSN: 0006-3363            Impact factor:   4.285


  13 in total

1.  Cell sorting but not serum starvation is effective for SV40 human corneal epithelial cell cycle synchronization.

Authors:  Sara J Liliensiek; Kathleen Schell; Elise Howard; Paul Nealey; Christopher J Murphy
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 3.467

2.  Pharmacologic treatment of donor cells induced to have a Warburg effect-like metabolism does not alter embryonic development in vitro or survival during early gestation when used in somatic cell nuclear transfer in pigs.

Authors:  Bethany R Mordhorst; Stephanie L Murphy; Renee M Ross; Joshua A Benne; Melissa S Samuel; Raissa F Cecil; Bethany K Redel; Lee D Spate; Clifton N Murphy; Kevin D Wells; Jonathan A Green; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.609

3.  Cloned ferrets produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Ziyi Li; Xingshen Sun; Juan Chen; Xiaoming Liu; Samantha M Wisely; Qi Zhou; Jean-Paul Renard; Gregory H Leno; John F Engelhardt
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Microtubule distribution in somatic cell nuclear transfer bovine embryos following control of nuclear remodeling type.

Authors:  Dae Jin Kwon; Yu Mi Lee; In Sun Hwang; Choon Keun Park; Boo Keun Yang; Hee Tae Cheong
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.672

5.  Effects of combined treatment of MG132 and scriptaid on early and term development of porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos.

Authors:  Jiude Mao; Kimberly Tessanne; Kristin M Whitworth; Lee D Spate; Eric M Walters; Melissa S Samuel; Clifton N Murphy; Lisa Tracy; Jianguo Zhao; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 1.987

6.  Development and calcium level changes in pre-implantation porcine nuclear transfer embryos activated with 6-DMAP after fusion.

Authors:  Gi-Sun Im; Melissa Samuel; Liangxue Lai; Yanhong Hao; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.609

7.  Development of porcine embryos reconstituted with somatic cells and enucleated metaphase I and II oocytes matured in a protein-free medium.

Authors:  K Miyoshi; S J Rzucidlo; J R Gibbons; S Arat; S L Stice
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2001-07-11       Impact factor: 1.978

Review 8.  Factors affecting the development of somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos in Cattle.

Authors:  Satoshi Akagi; Kazutsugu Matsukawa; Seiya Takahashi
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 9.  Progress toward generating a ferret model of cystic fibrosis by somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Ziyi Li; John F Engelhardt
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  Porcine Fetal-Derived Fibroblasts Alter Gene Expression and Mitochondria to Compensate for Hypoxic Stress During Culture.

Authors:  Bethany R Mordhorst; Stephanie L Murphy; Martin Schauflinger; Shirley Rojas Salazar; Tieming Ji; Susanta K Behura; Kevin D Wells; Jonathan A Green; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.987

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.