Literature DB >> 11133546

MR urography in evaluation of acute flank pain: T2-weighted sequences and gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional FLASH compared with urography. Fast low-angle shot.

M Sudah1, R Vanninen, K Partanen, A Heino, P Vainio, M Ala-Opas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the usefulness of breath-hold heavily T2-weighted sequences with gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional fast low-angle shot (3D FLASH) MR urography in the evaluation of patients with acute flank pain. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients with symptoms of acute flank pain underwent MR urography followed immediately by excretory urography. Heavily T2-weighted (combined thin-slice half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo [HASTE] and thick-slab single-shot turbo spin-echo) and 3D FLASH sequences were evaluated separately and independently by two experienced radiologists for the presence, cause, level, and degree of obstruction. Interobserver agreement was calculated using the kappa statistic. Excretory urography and the final clinical diagnosis were used as reference.
RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were found to have unilateral obstruction caused by ureteral stones. Both MR urography methods were excellent for detecting obstruction. In the detection of stones 3D FLASH was superior, with a sensitivity of 96.2% and 100% and specificity of 100% and 100% for observers A and B, respectively, compared with a sensitivity of 57.7% and 53.8% and a specificity of 100% and 100%, respectively, for T2-weighted sequences. The best degree of obstruction was seen with 3D FLASH, and the interobserver agreement was excellent for stone detection (kappa = 0.97).
CONCLUSION: T2-weighted sequences alone are not sufficient for examining patients with acute flank pain. However, the combined use of both T2-weighted and 3D FLASH sequences will ensure better confidence in the evaluation of acute suspected renal colic. MR urography can replace conventional excretory urography when the latter is contraindicated or undesirable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11133546     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.176.1.1760105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  15 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation and follow-up of patients with urinary lithiasis: minimizing radiation exposure.

Authors:  Elias S Hyams; Ojas Shah
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Understanding multislice CT urography techniques: Many roads lead to Rome.

Authors:  Claus Nolte-Ernsting; Nigel Cowan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  [Diagnostic imaging--the end of intravenous urography?].

Authors:  W L Strohmaier; R Bartunek
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance urography using a balanced turbo field echo sequence.

Authors:  Egemen Çifçi; Gökçen Çoban; Tufan Çiçek; Umut Gönülalan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Imaging in the diagnosis of pediatric urolithiasis.

Authors:  Gabrielle C Colleran; Michael J Callahan; Harriet J Paltiel; Caleb P Nelson; Bartley G Cilento; Michelle A Baum; Jeanne S Chow
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-11-04

Review 6.  [MR urography: principles, examination techniques, indications].

Authors:  M Memarsadeghi; M Riccabona; G Heinz-Peer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Filling defect artefacts in magnetic resonance urography.

Authors:  G Girish; W K Chooi; S K Morcos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-07-05       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Evaluation of acute renal colic: a comparison of non-contrast CT versus 3-T non-contrast HASTE MR urography.

Authors:  M J Semins; Z Feng; B Trock; M Bohlman; W Hosek; B R Matlaga
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2012-12-25       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 9.  Imaging for kidney stones.

Authors:  P N Rao
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  MRI of the kidney-state of the art.

Authors:  J J Nikken; G P Krestin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.