Literature DB >> 11133316

Dissociating state and item components of recognition memory using fMRI.

D I Donaldson1, S E Petersen, J M Ollinger, R L Buckner.   

Abstract

Cognitive functions such as memory retrieval involve a combination of state- and item-related processes. State-related processes are sustained throughout a task (e.g., "retrieval mode" associated with ongoing goals), whereas item-related processes are transient and allied to individual stimuli (e.g., "retrieval success" associated with the recovery of information from memory). The present study employed a mixed "blocked and event-related" experimental design to identify neural mechanisms that support state- and item-related processes during a recognition memory task. Subjects alternated between blocks of fixation and recognition memory (discriminating between old and new words). Critically, event-related procedures were embedded within the recognition blocks, including the jittering of sequential trials. This design ensures that the temporal profiles of state- and item-related activity differ and consequently renders them separable; without this procedure item-related activity would summate to produce a state-like response. Results suggest three classes of brain region support recognition memory, exhibiting: (1) predominantly transient activity (including regions in medial parietal, lateral parietal, and anterior left frontal cortex) reflecting item-related processing associated with "retrieval success," (2) predominantly sustained activity (including decreased activity in bilateral parahippocampal cortex) reflecting state-related processing associated with "retrieval mode," (3) concurrent sustained and transient activity (including regions in left middle frontal gyrus, bilateral frontal operculum, and medial frontal gyrus), reflecting a combination of state- and item-related processing. The present findings support the idea that recognition memory tasks are dependent upon a combination of state- and item-related processes that have dissociable neural correlates identifiable using fMRI. Moreover, the mixed "blocked and event-related" design employed here provides a general procedure for separating state- and item-related processes. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11133316     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  69 in total

1.  Hemispheric asymmetry in human lateral prefrontal cortex during cognitive set shifting.

Authors:  Seiki Konishi; Toshihiro Hayashi; Idai Uchida; Hideyuki Kikyo; Emi Takahashi; Yasushi Miyashita
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The change of the brain activation patterns as children learn algebra equation solving.

Authors:  Yulin Qin; Cameron S Carter; Eli M Silk; V Andrew Stenger; Kate Fissell; Adam Goode; John R Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Emotion regulation reduces loss aversion and decreases amygdala responses to losses.

Authors:  Peter Sokol-Hessner; Colin F Camerer; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Taking a different perspective: mindset influences neural regions that represent value and choice.

Authors:  Jamil P Bhanji; Jennifer S Beer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Perimenopausal use of hormone therapy is associated with enhanced memory and hippocampal function later in life.

Authors:  Pauline M Maki; Lorraine Dennerstein; Margaret Clark; Janet Guthrie; Pamela LaMontagne; Deanne Fornelli; Deborah Little; Victor W Henderson; Susan M Resnick
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Hyper-modulation of brain networks by the amygdala among women with Borderline Personality Disorder: Network signatures of affective interference during cognitive processing.

Authors:  Paul H Soloff; Kristy Abraham; Karthik Ramaseshan; Ashley Burgess; Vaibhav A Diwadkar
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.791

Review 7.  The mixed block/event-related design.

Authors:  Steven E Petersen; Joseph W Dubis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Affective personality differences in neural processing efficiency confirmed using fMRI.

Authors:  Jeremy R Gray; Gregory C Burgess; Alexandre Schaefer; Tal Yarkoni; Randy J Larsen; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Early visual cortex reflects initiation and maintenance of task set.

Authors:  Abdurahman S Elkhetali; Ryan J Vaden; Sean M Pool; Kristina M Visscher
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Anxiety and cognitive efficiency: differential modulation of transient and sustained neural activity during a working memory task.

Authors:  C L Fales; D M Barch; G C Burgess; A Schaefer; D S Mennin; J R Gray; T S Braver
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.