Literature DB >> 11133194

Noise and incongruence: interpreting results of the incongruence length difference test.

K Dolphin1, R Belshaw, C D Orme, D L Quicke.   

Abstract

Incongruence between data sets is an important concept in molecular phylogenetics and is commonly measured by the incongruence length difference (ILD) test (J. S. Farris et al., Cladistics 10, 315-319). The ILD test has been used to infer specific evolutionary events and to determine whether to combine data sets for phylogenetic analysis. However, the interpretation in the literature of the test's results varies because authors have conflicting expectations of the effect that noise will have. Using simulations we demonstrate that noise can by itself generate highly significant results in the ILD test and demonstrate why this is the case. To clarify the interpretation of test results, we suggest an additional procedure in which the result is compared against a frequency distribution generated from completely shuffled data. As examples, we apply this approach to two previous studies that have reported incongruence. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11133194     DOI: 10.1006/mpev.2000.0845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  24 in total

1.  Phylogenetic analysis of pelecaniformes (aves) based on osteological data: implications for waterbird phylogeny and fossil calibration studies.

Authors:  Nathan D Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Evolution of the army ant syndrome: the origin and long-term evolutionary stasis of a complex of behavioral and reproductive adaptations.

Authors:  Seán G Brady
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The evolution of soil-burrowing cockroaches (Blattaria: Blaberidae) from wood-burrowing ancestors following an invasion of the latter from Asia into Australia.

Authors:  Kiyoto Maekawa; Nathan Lo; Harley A Rose; Tadao Matsumoto
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Phylogeny and diversification of the largest avian radiation.

Authors:  F Keith Barker; Alice Cibois; Peter Schikler; Julie Feinstein; Joel Cracraft
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Craniodental and Postcranial Characters of Non-Avian Dinosauria Often Imply Different Trees.

Authors:  Yimeng Li; Marcello Ruta; Matthew A Wills
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  Phylogenetic relationships among arecoid palms (Arecaceae: Arecoideae).

Authors:  William J Baker; Maria V Norup; James J Clarkson; Thomas L P Couvreur; John L Dowe; Carl E Lewis; Jean-Christophe Pintaud; Vincent Savolainen; Tomas Wilmot; Mark W Chase
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Molecular phylogeny and spore evolution of Entolomataceae.

Authors:  D Co-David; D Langeveld; M E Noordeloos
Journal:  Persoonia       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 11.051

Review 8.  Progress, pitfalls and parallel universes: a history of insect phylogenetics.

Authors:  Karl M Kjer; Chris Simon; Margarita Yavorskaya; Rolf G Beutel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Phylogenetic incongruence in the Drosophila melanogaster species group.

Authors:  Alex Wong; Jeffrey D Jensen; John E Pool; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2006-09-09       Impact factor: 4.286

10.  Molecular phylogeny of the small ermine moth genus Yponomeuta (Lepidoptera, Yponomeutidae) in the palaearctic.

Authors:  Hubert Turner; Niek Lieshout; Wil E Van Ginkel; Steph B J Menken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.