Literature DB >> 11132128

Evaluation of the capacity of sunscreens to photoprotect lupus erythematosus patients by employing the photoprovocation test.

H Stege1, M A Budde, S Grether-Beck, J Krutmann.   

Abstract

Although sunscreens are widely used to photoprotect patients with photosensitive lupus erythematosus (LE), standardized controlled studies that can prove their efficacy for this indication have been lacking. Therefore, in the present study, the capacity of three different, commercially available sunscreens to prevent the development of skin lesions that have been induced in LE patients under standardized, reproducible conditions by employing a provocative phototest was assessed. In a double blind, intraindividual comparative study, 11 patients with LE were photoprovoked according to a standard protocol. All patients developed LE-specific skin lesions upon photoprovocation with a combination of UVA plus UVB radiation. Each of the sunscreens tested prevented the development of skin lesions in this assay, but to various extents. Suncreen A (UVB: Octocrylene; UVA: Mexoryl SX, Mexoryl XL, Parsol 1789; TiO2) was by far the most effective by protecting in 11/11 patients. This protective capacity was corroborated by studies in which strong ICAM-1 mRNA expression was found in unprotected test areas, but not in sunscreen A pretreated sites. In contrast to sunscreen A, sunscreen B (UVB: Eusolex 6300, Parsol MCX, Uvinul T150, Neohelipan; UVA: Parsol 1789; TiO2) protected in 5 patients and sunscreen C (Eusolex 6300, Parsol MCX, Uvinul T150; UVA: Parsol 1789; TiO2) in 3 out of 11 patients. These studies indicate that the use of sunscreens is beneficial to LE patients because it can prevent the development of UV radiation-induced skin lesions. Effective protection, however, might vary considerably between different sunscreens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11132128     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0781.2000.160604.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed        ISSN: 0905-4383            Impact factor:   3.135


  7 in total

1.  [Light induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematodes: diagnosis and management].

Authors:  M Haust; S Meller; D Bruch-Gerharz; B Homey
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 2.  [New aspects in the development of sunscreening agents].

Authors:  J Lademann; M C Meinke; S Schanzer; S Albrecht; L Zastrow
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 3.  Treatment of cutaneous lupus.

Authors:  Aileen Y Chang; Victoria P Werth
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 4.  [Modern therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus].

Authors:  R Fischer-Betz; M Schneider
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.372

5.  Potential allergenicity of commonly sold high SPF broad spectrum sunscreens in the United States; from the perspective of patients with autoimmune skin disease.

Authors:  Emily Keyes; Victoria P Werth; Bruce Brod
Journal:  Int J Womens Dermatol       Date:  2019-05-23

6.  'More extraordinary than mundane … ' A phenomenological analysis of the experiences of individuals living with CLE and their taking care in the sun.

Authors:  Bláithín McGarry; Donal O'Kane; Collette McCourt; Gerard J Gormley
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.911

7.  Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Cora W Hannon; Collette McCourt; Hermenio C Lima; Suephy Chen; Cathy Bennett
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.