Literature DB >> 11131311

Quality of life after cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder versus ileal conduit urinary diversion.

A Hobisch1, K Tosun, J Kinzl, G Kemmler, G Bartsch, L Höltl, A Stenzl.   

Abstract

The impact of bladder removal and urinary diversion for patients' everyday life is largely unknown. The aims of this study were to compare subjective morbidity of ileal neobladder to the urethra versus ileal conduit urinary diversion and to elucidate its influence on quality of life. A total of 102 patients who underwent cystectomy due to a bladder malignancy were included in the study. In 69 patients (67.6%) an orthotopic neobladder and in 33 patients (32.4%) an ileal conduit was performed as urinary diversion. The compliance was 99% and mean follow-up was 37 months. All patients completed two retrospective quality of life questionnaires, namely the QLQ-C30 and a questionnaire developed at our institution to ask for urinary diversion specific items. The questioning and assessment was performed by non-urologists. The results obtained from the validated (QLQ-C30) and our own specially compiled questionnaire clearly demonstrate that patients with an orthotopic neobladder are more able to adapt to the new situation than patients with an ileal conduit. In addition, neobladder to the urethra improves the quality of life because it improves self-confidence, causes better rehabilitation as well as the restoration of leisure, professional, travelling, and social activities, and reduced risk of inadvertent loss of urine. For example, 92.8% of neobladder patients did not feel handicapped at all, and 87% did not feel sick or ill, in contrast to 51.5% and 66.7% of ileal conduit patients, respectively. Of the neobladder patients, 74.6% felt absolutely safe with the urinary diversion in contrast to 33.3% in the ileal conduit group. Only 1.5% of neobladder patients had wet clothes caused by urine leakage during the day, versus 48.5% of ileal conduit patients. Moreover, 97% of our neobladder patients would recommend the same urinary diversion to a friend suffering from the same disease, but only 36% of ileal conduit patients would do so. These results demonstrate that the quality of life is preserved to a higher degree after orthotopic neobladder than after ileal conduit urinary diversion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11131311     DOI: 10.1007/s003450000147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  21 in total

1.  [Urinary diversion after cystectomy: aspects of quality of life and options for rehabilitation].

Authors:  M Zellner; R Riedl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Determining when to recommend continent urinary diversion.

Authors:  Scott M Gilbert; James E Montie
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between ileal conduit diversion and orthotopic neobladder based on validated questionnaires: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hangchuan Shi; Han Yu; Joaquim Bellmunt; Jeffrey J Leow; Xuanyu Chen; Changcheng Guo; Hongmei Yang; Xiaoping Zhang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Is Health-Related Quality of Life after Radical Cystectomy Using Validated Questionnaires Really Better in Patients with Ileal Orthotopic Neobladder Compared to Ileal Conduit: A Meta-Analysis of Retrospective Comparative Studies.

Authors:  Maria A Cerruto; Carolina D'Elia; Salvatore Siracusano; Antonio B Porcaro; Giovanni Cacciamani; Davide De Marchi; Mauro Niero; Cristina Lonardi; Massimo Iafrate; Pierfrancesco Bassi; Emanuele Belgrano; Ciro Imbimbo; Marco Racioppi; Renato Talamini; Stefano Ciciliato; Laura Toffoli; Michele Rizzo; Francesco Visalli; Paolo Verze; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2017-05-30

Review 5.  Radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder for invasive bladder cancer: a critical analysis of long-term oncological, functional, and quality of life results.

Authors:  Udo Nagele; Aristotelis G Anastasiadis; Arnulf Stenzl; Markus Kuczyk
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  [Patients' acceptance of urinary diversion. The pouch of Sisyphus].

Authors:  F-C von Rundstedt; S Roth; C R J Woodhouse; W Månsson; E W Gerharz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Prostatic urethral biopsy has limited usefulness in counseling patients regarding final urethral margin status during orthotopic neobladder reconstruction.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Philippe E Spiess; Gordon A Brown; Ping Liu; H Barton Grossman; Colin P N Dinney; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Going with the flow: quality-of-life outcomes of cancer survivors with urinary diversion.

Authors:  Robin Gemmill; Virginia Sun; Betty Ferrell; Robert S Krouse; Marcia Grant
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.741

9.  Orthotopic neobladder versus ileal conduit urinary diversion after cystectomy--a quality-of-life based comparison.

Authors:  Joe Philip; Ramaswamy Manikandan; Suresh Venugopal; John Desouza; Pradip M Javlé
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Quality of life and functional outcomes after radical cystectomy with ileal orthotopic neobladder replacement for bladder cancer: a multicentre observational study.

Authors:  E Pons-Tostivint; M Roumiguié; V Tostivint; G Verhoest; B Cabarrou; J Gas; P Coloby; J Zgheib; M Thoulouzan; M Soulié; X Gamé; J B Beauval
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.