Literature DB >> 11130815

An instrumental variables approach to measuring the effect of body weight on employment disability.

J Cawley1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure the effect of body weight on employment disability. DATA SOURCES: Female respondents to the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY), a nationally representative sample of American youth, surveyed from 1979 to 1998, merged with data from the child sample of the NLSY. STUDY
DESIGN: A series of probit models and probit models with instrumental variables is estimated with the goal of measuring the effect of body weight on employment disability. The two outcomes of interest are whether a woman reports that her health limits the amount of work that she can do for pay, and whether she reports that her health limits the kind of work that she can do for pay. The models control for factors that affect the probability of health limitations on employment, such as education, cognitive ability, income of other family members, and characteristics of children in the household. Self-reports of height and weight are corrected for reporting error. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: All else being equal, heavier women are more likely to report employment disability. However, this overall correlation may be due to any or all of the following factors: weight causing disability, disability causing weight gain, or unobserved factors causing both. Instrumental variables estimates provide no evidence that body weight affects the probability of either type of employment disability.
CONCLUSIONS: This study finds no evidence that body weight causes employment disability. Instead, the observed correlation between heaviness and disability may be due to disability causing weight gain or unobservable factors causing both disability and weight gain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11130815      PMCID: PMC1089168     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  16 in total

1.  Recent advances in basic obesity research.

Authors:  J A Yanovski; S Z Yanovski
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-27       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Childhood body mass index--genetic and familial environmental influences assessed in a longitudinal adoption study.

Authors:  T I Sørensen; C Holst; A J Stunkard
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  1992-09

Review 3.  Econometrics in outcomes research: the use of instrumental variables.

Authors:  J P Newhouse; M McClellan
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 4.  Current estimates of the economic cost of obesity in the United States.

Authors:  A M Wolf; G A Colditz
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  1998-03

5.  The spread of the obesity epidemic in the United States, 1991-1998.

Authors:  A H Mokdad; M K Serdula; W H Dietz; B A Bowman; J S Marks; J P Koplan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-27       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Overweight and obesity in the United States: prevalence and trends, 1960-1994.

Authors:  K M Flegal; M D Carroll; R J Kuczmarski; C L Johnson
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  1998-01

7.  Influences of genes and shared family environment on adult body mass index assessed in an adoption study by a comprehensive path model.

Authors:  G P Vogler; T I Sørensen; A J Stunkard; M R Srinivasan; D C Rao
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  1995-01

Review 8.  Genetic and environmental factors in relative body weight and human adiposity.

Authors:  H H Maes; M C Neale; L J Eaves
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.805

9.  Economic consequences of sick-leave and early retirement in obese Swedish women.

Authors:  K Narbro; E Jonsson; B Larsson; H Waaler; H Wedel; L Sjöström
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  1996-10

10.  Does obesity run in families because of genes? An adoption study using silhouettes as a measure of obesity.

Authors:  T I Sørensen; A J Stunkard
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl       Date:  1993
View more
  21 in total

1.  Overview of the special supplement issue.

Authors:  M B McClellan; J P Newhouse
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Obesity, family instability, and socioemotional health in adolescence.

Authors:  Robert Crosnoe
Journal:  Econ Hum Biol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 2.184

3.  Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling.

Authors:  Joseph V Terza; Anirban Basu; Paul J Rathouz
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Waist circumference, body mass index, and employment outcomes.

Authors:  Jonas Minet Kinge
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2016-10-11

5.  Cumulative structural disadvantage and racial health disparities: the pathways of childhood socioeconomic influence.

Authors:  Jeremy Pais
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2014-10

6.  Obesity Among U.S.- and Foreign-Born Blacks by Region of Birth.

Authors:  Neil K Mehta; Irma T Elo; Nicole D Ford; Karen R Siegel
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Mortality benefit of transfer to level I versus level II trauma centers for head-injured patients.

Authors:  K John McConnell; Craig D Newgard; Richard J Mullins; Melanie Arthur; Jerris R Hedges
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  The association between BMI and mortality using offspring BMI as an indicator of own BMI: large intergenerational mortality study.

Authors:  George Davey Smith; Jonathan A C Sterne; Abigail Fraser; Per Tynelius; Debbie A Lawlor; Finn Rasmussen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-12-22

9.  Neighborhoods and obesity in later life.

Authors:  Irina B Grafova; Vicki A Freedman; Rizie Kumar; Jeannette Rogowski
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Genetic information, obesity, and labor market outcomes.

Authors:  Edward C Norton; Euna Han
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.