Literature DB >> 11129374

Expecting a break in time estimation: attentional time-sharing without concurrent processing.

C Fortin1, N Massé.   

Abstract

The interference from nontemporal processing on concurrent time estimation is usually attributed to disruption in timing caused by attentional requirements of nontemporal processing. Here, we examined interruption in timing without concurrent nontemporal processing. Empty breaks of various durations, during time-interval production, lengthened produced intervals. Moreover, an effect of break location was observed: Intervals lengthened proportionally to prebreak duration. When cued and uncued uninterrupted trials were introduced, the lengthening was proportional to the duration for which a break was expected. It was concluded that attentional time-sharing between time estimation and expectation of its interruption contributed to the interference effect in time-estimation research, independently of any concurrent processing requirements during time estimation.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11129374     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.6.1788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  13 in total

1.  Effect of clozapine on interval timing and working memory for time in the peak-interval procedure with gaps.

Authors:  Catalin V Buhusi; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2006-10-14       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Effect of tactile stimulus frequency on time perception: the role of working memory.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Khoshnoodi; Rouzbeh Motiei-Langroudi; Mohsen Omrani; Mathew E Diamond; Abdol Hossein Abbassian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Relative time sharing: new findings and an extension of the resource allocation model of temporal processing.

Authors:  Catalin V Buhusi; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Movement timing and cognitive control: adult-age differences in multi-tasking.

Authors:  Anne-Merel Meijer; Ralf T Krampe
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-06-17

Review 5.  Motivation and timing: clues for modeling the reward system.

Authors:  Tiffany Galtress; Andrew T Marshall; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Time perception is not for the faint-hearted? Physiological arousal does not influence duration categorisation.

Authors:  Valérie Dormal; Alexandre Heeren; Mauro Pesenti; Pierre Maurage
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-12-20

7.  Mechanisms of impulsive choice: II. Time-based interventions to improve self-control.

Authors:  Aaron P Smith; Andrew T Marshall; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  The Strength of Alpha-Beta Oscillatory Coupling Predicts Motor Timing Precision.

Authors:  Laetitia Grabot; Tadeusz W Kononowicz; Tom Dupré la Tour; Alexandre Gramfort; Valérie Doyère; Virginie van Wassenhove
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Mechanisms of impulsive choice: I. Individual differences in interval timing and reward processing.

Authors:  Andrew T Marshall; Aaron P Smith; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Evidence for age-related changes to temporal attention and memory from the choice time production task.

Authors:  Cynthia M Gooch; Yaakov Stern; Brian C Rakitin
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2009-01-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.