Literature DB >> 11129012

The role of fiberoptic nasopharyngoscopy in the management of the acute airway in angioneurotic edema.

B L Bentsianov1, A Parhiscar, M Azer, G Har-El.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Angioneurotic edema of the upper aerodigestive tract (AEUAT) often challenges the otolaryngologist with the decision of surgical intervention versus observation.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a logical approach to the evaluation and management of the airway in patients with AEUAT, emphasizing fiberoptic examination (FOE) findings.
METHODS: A computer-based retrospective review of all patients diagnosed with AEUAT was performed. The charts were reviewed for demographics, etiology, medical history, presentation, physical examination, imaging studies, intervention, and outcome. Findings on FOE as well as other covariants were statistically compared.
RESULTS: Seventy patients with AEUAT were identified. The etiologies consisted of 24 cases of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor use (33%), 10 allergic reactions (17%), 1 hereditary (1.5%), and 35 idiopathic cases (48%). Fourteen patients underwent airway intervention, including 6 tracheotomies and 8 intubations. Of the 14 patients, 5 underwent emergent intervention before fiberoptic examination, 4 had laryngeal edema only, and 5 had both laryngeal and base of tongue edema. No patients with both laryngeal and base of tongue edema were observed. The remaining 52 patients were observed in a monitored setting and required no subsequent intervention.
CONCLUSION: FOE is an invaluable tool in the assessment of the compromised airway in patients with angioneurotic edema Laryngeal edema alone is an ominous physical finding. When laryngeal and pharyngeal edema are present together, the physician should consider immediate intervention. Our findings indicate that symptoms, including stridor, hoarseness, and dysphagia, do correlate with disease severity; however, they must be confirmed with fiberoptic visualization. Although sound clinical judgment should always be exercised, we present our results in the management of the acute airway in angioneurotic edema.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11129012     DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200012000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  6 in total

1.  A consensus parameter for the evaluation and management of angioedema in the emergency department.

Authors:  Joseph J Moellman; Jonathan A Bernstein; Christopher Lindsell; Aleena Banerji; Paula J Busse; Carlos A Camargo; Sean P Collins; Timothy J Craig; William R Lumry; Richard Nowak; Jesse M Pines; Ali S Raja; Marc Riedl; Michael J Ward; Bruce L Zuraw; Deborah Diercks; Brian Hiestand; Ronna L Campbell; Sandra Schneider; Richard Sinert
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  Evaluation of staging criteria for disposition and airway intervention in emergency department angioedema patients.

Authors:  Conor Dass; Maggie Mahaffa; Elizabeth Dang; Ronna Campbell; Zuhair Ballas; Sangil Lee
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2021-10-26

3.  Nasopharyngolaryngoscopy as a Triage Tool for Airway Compromise in Angioedema: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Shameek Gayen; Tejas Sinha; Veena Dronamraju; Bilal Lashari; Huaqing Zhao; Santosh Dhungana
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-02

4.  Intubation of patients with angioedema: A retrospective study of different methods over three year period.

Authors:  Aaron Wood; Dominik Choromanski; Marc Orlewicz
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2013-04

5.  The role of serial physical examinations in the management of angioedema involving the head and neck: A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Gary Linkov; Jennifer R Cracchiolo; Norman J Chan; Megan Healy; Nausheen Jamal; Ahmed M S Soliman
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-02-09

6.  Hereditary angioedema.

Authors:  Helen Lesser; Jason E Cohn
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2021-07-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.