Literature DB >> 11128173

Home visiting intervention for vulnerable families with newborns: follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial.

J A Fraser1, K L Armstrong, J P Morris, M R Dadds.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to: (1) Assess the community utility of a screening tool to identify families with child abuse or neglect risk factors in the immediate postnatal period (2) Determine the social validity and effectiveness of a home visiting program using community child health nurses and offering social work services for identified families, and (3) Identify factors in the immediate postnatal period associated with the child's environment that predict poor adjustment to the parenting role.
METHOD: A randomized controlled trial using a cohort of 181 families was undertaken to evaluate the impact of a home visiting program. Mothers were recruited in the immediate postnatal period and allocated either into the home visiting program or into a comparison group. The research design required self-identification into the study by providing positive responses to a range of risk factors. A repeated measures design was used to test parenting stress and maternal depression from the immediate postnatal period to 12-month follow-up and physical child abuse potential to 18-month follow-up. To test whether measures taken in the immediate postnatal period were predictive for poor adjustment to the parenting role, a linear regression model was used.
RESULTS: The screening procedure was shown to have utility in the context of recruitment to a research trial and mothers were willing to accept the home visiting program examined by this study from the immediate postnatal period. From as early as 6 weeks the program demonstrated ability to impact positively on maternal, infant, family, and home environment variables (testing 90 randomly allocated intervention vs. 91 comparison families). At follow-up, parental adjustment variables were not significantly different between groups (testing the remaining 68 (75.5%) intervention vs. 70 (76.9%) comparison families) and home environment assessment scores had converged. Predictive analysis of factors measured in the immediate postnatal period revealed an absence of any predictive value to demographic characteristics, which secondary prevention efforts typically target.
CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up evaluation did not demonstrate a positive impact on parenting stress, parenting competence, or quality of the home environment confirming the need to test early program success on longer term outcomes. Further, thestudy not only demonstrated that there was a relationship between maternal, family and environmental factors identified in the immediate postnatal period. and adjustment to the parenting role, but also challenged demographic targeting for child abuse and neglect risk. At the same time, the immediate postnatal period presented an exciting window of opportunity to access high-risk families who may otherwise have become marginalized from traditional services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11128173     DOI: 10.1016/s0145-2134(00)00193-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Abuse Negl        ISSN: 0145-2134


  18 in total

Review 1.  Biological and psychosocial predictors of postpartum depression: systematic review and call for integration.

Authors:  Ilona S Yim; Lynlee R Tanner Stapleton; Christine M Guardino; Jennifer Hahn-Holbrook; Christine Dunkel Schetter
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 18.561

Review 2.  Community mental health care for women with severe mental illness who are parents.

Authors:  Mary F Brunette; Wendy Dean
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2002-04

Review 3.  Home visits during pregnancy and after birth for women with an alcohol or drug problem.

Authors:  Catherine Turnbull; David A Osborn
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-01-18

4.  Cumulative environmental risk in substance abusing women: early intervention, parenting stress, child abuse potential and child development.

Authors:  Susan J Kelley
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2003-09

5.  Family risk as a predictor of initial engagement and follow-through in a universal nurse home visiting program to prevent child maltreatment.

Authors:  Shelley Alonso-Marsden; Kenneth A Dodge; Karen J O'Donnell; Robert A Murphy; Jeannine M Sato; Christina Christopoulos
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2013-05-06

Review 6.  Do early childhood interventions prevent child maltreatment? A review of research.

Authors:  Arthur J Reynolds; Lindsay C Mathieson; James W Topitzes
Journal:  Child Maltreat       Date:  2009-02-24

Review 7.  Parenting interventions for the prevention of unintentional injuries in childhood.

Authors:  Denise Kendrick; Caroline A Mulvaney; Lily Ye; Tony Stevens; Julie A Mytton; Sarah Stewart-Brown
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-03-28

8.  Preventing mental health problems in children: the Families in Mind population-based cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Harriet Hiscock; Jordana K Bayer; Kate Lycett; Obioha C Ukoumunne; Daniel Shaw; Lisa Gold; Bibi Gerner; Amy Loughman; Melissa Wake
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Mothers' AdvocateS In the Community (MOSAIC)--non-professional mentor support to reduce intimate partner violence and depression in mothers: a cluster randomised trial in primary care.

Authors:  Angela J Taft; Rhonda Small; Kelsey L Hegarty; Lyndsey F Watson; Lisa Gold; Judith A Lumley
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  The association between maltreatment in childhood and pre-pregnancy obesity in women attending an antenatal clinic in Australia.

Authors:  Katharine Hollingsworth; Leonie Callaway; Michael Duhig; Sally Matheson; James Scott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.