Literature DB >> 11127939

Predictive factors of response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy and the relation of response to survival in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer.

L Sengeløv1, C Kamby, P Geertsen, L J Andersen, H von der Maase.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify pretreatment variables predicting overall and complete response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy for metastatic urothelial cancer, and to study the relation between response and the duration of survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 119 evaluable patients with recurrent locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer received cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy in four consecutive phase II studies from 1987 to 1997. The relationship of pretreatment variables and response was evaluated with logistic regression, and prognostic factors for survival were analyzed with Cox's multivariate model.
RESULTS: Response was achieved in 49% of the patients with a complete response rate of 15%. Good performance status and absence of bone metastases were independently predictive of overall response. Good performance status and normal hemoglobin were independently predictive of complete response. Median survival was 8.9 months. Performance status, alkaline phosphatase, s-creatinine, liver and bone metastases were independent prognostic factors for survival. Median survival was 12.4 months in responding patients and 6.3 in nonresponding patients. Response to chemotherapy was included in the multivariate model and was the strongest prognostic factor for survival.
CONCLUSION: The presence of bone metastases, low hemoglobin or poor performance status predicts decreased chance of response to chemotherapy. Response to chemotherapy is an independent prognostic factor for prolonged survival in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11127939     DOI: 10.1007/s002800000176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  9 in total

1.  A Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument to Assess Symptom Burden and Predict Survival in Patients with Advanced Cancer: Flipping the Paradigm to Improve Timing of Palliative and End-of-Life Discussions and Reduce Unwanted Health Care Costs.

Authors:  Stuart L Goldberg; Dhakshila Paramanathan; Raya Khoury; Sharmi Patel; Dayo Jagun; Srikesh Arunajadai; Victoria DeVincenzo; Ruth Pe Benito; Brooke Gruman; Sukhi Kaur; Scott Paddock; Andrew D Norden; Eric V Schultz; John Hervey; Terrill Jordan; Andre Goy; Andrew L Pecora
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-09-28

Review 2.  Prognostic factors in patients with recently diagnosed incurable cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Catherine A Hauser; Martin R Stockler; Martin H N Tattersall
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Management of Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma in Older and Frail Patients: Have Novel Treatment Approaches Improved Their Care?

Authors:  Brian M Russell; Leora Boussi; Joaquim Bellmunt
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.271

4.  Prognostic factors for soft tissue sarcoma patients with lung metastases only who are receiving first-line chemotherapy: An exploratory, retrospective analysis of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (EORTC-STBSG).

Authors:  Lars H Lindner; Saskia Litière; Stefan Sleijfer; Charlotte Benson; Antoine Italiano; Bernd Kasper; Christina Messiou; Hans Gelderblom; Eva Wardelmann; Axel Le Cesne; Jean-Yves Blay; Sandrine Marreaud; Nadia Hindi; Ingrid M E Desar; Alessandro Gronchi; Winette T A van der Graaf
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  The Incidence of Hyponatraemia and Its Effect on the ECOG Performance Status among Lung Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Amitabha Sengupta; Sourindra Nath Banerjee; Nirendra Mohan Biswas; Debraj Jash; Kaushik Saha; Arnab Maji; Ankan Bandyopadhyaya; Sandip Agarwal
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-08-01

6.  Prognostic Value of Pre-operative Renal Insufficiency in Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jian Cao; Xiaokun Zhao; Zhaohui Zhong; Lei Zhang; Xuan Zhu; Ran Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Performance status score: do patients and their oncologists agree?

Authors:  S P Blagden; S C Charman; L D Sharples; L R A Magee; D Gilligan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  Moving beyond Karnofsky and ECOG Performance Status Assessments with New Technologies.

Authors:  Ciara M Kelly; Armin Shahrokni
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.375

9.  Early objective response may not be a prognostic factor of survival for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: from a retrospective analysis of a cohort of 113 patients.

Authors:  Guilhem Roubaud; Véronique Brouste; Phillipe Beuzeboc; Aude Fléchon; Diego Tosi; Sandrine Lavau-Denes; Christine Chevreau; Stéphane Culine; Stéphane Oudard; Amandine Quivy; Philippe Pourquier; Nadine Houédé
Journal:  J Negat Results Biomed       Date:  2015-11-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.