Literature DB >> 11127645

Limited role of direct exchange arthroplasty in the treatment of infected total hip replacements.

W O Jackson1, T P Schmalzried.   

Abstract

A literature review was performed to determine when direct exchange was most likely to be successful. Twelve reports provided outcome data on infected hip replacements treated with direct exchange. The average duration of followup was 4.8 years, but the range was broad (0.1-17.1 years). Of the 1,299 infected hip replacements treated with direct exchange, 1,077 (83%) were thought to be free of infection at the last followup. Antibiotic-impregnated bone cement was used in 1,282 of the cases (99%). There was wide variability in the duration of parenteral antibiotic therapy, ranging from just 24 hours to as many as 8 weeks. In some cases, no oral antibiotics ever were given, whereas in others, oral antibiotics were given for as many as 8 months after parenteral therapy. Factors associated with a successful direct exchange included: (1) absence of wound complications after the initial total hip replacement; (2) good general health of the patient; (3) methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus species; and (4) an organism that was sensitive to the antibiotic mixed into the bone cement. Factors associated with failure included: (1) polymicrobial infection; (2) gram-negative organisms, especially Pseudomonas species; and (3) certain gram-positive organisms such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis and Group D Streptococcus. Methicillin-resistant organisms have become more common. Many current revision surgical techniques use cementless implants. Fixation without any cement (no depot antibiotics) may be a contraindication to direct exchange. Additionally, there essentially are no data on the use of bone graft in association with direct exchange. For these reasons, the indications for direct exchange are limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11127645     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200012000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  46 in total

1.  Treatment Options for Orthopedic Device-related Infections.

Authors:  Edna Toubes; John Segreti
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.725

2.  Infections Associated with Prosthetic Knee and Prosthetic Hip.

Authors:  Joseph R Lentino
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 3.  Infection in total hip replacement: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Surendra Senthi; Jacob T Munro; Rocco P Pitto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The antibacterial effects of zinc ion migration from zinc-based glass polyalkenoate cements.

Authors:  D Boyd; H Li; D A Tanner; M R Towler; J G Wall
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Risk factors for amputation in periprosthetic knee infection.

Authors:  Alan Giovanni Polanco-Armenta; Adrián Miguel-Pérez; Adrián Huetzemani Rivera-Villa; Manuel Ignacio Barrera-García; María Guadalupe Sánchez-Prado; Alberto Vázquez-Noya; Fernando Vidal-Cervantes; José de Jesús Guerra-Jasso; José Manuel Pérez-Atanasio
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-04-07

6.  What is the Long-term Economic Societal Effect of Periprosthetic Infections After THA? A Markov Analysis.

Authors:  Thomas J Parisi; Joseph F Konopka; Hany S Bedair
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Results after late polymicrobial, gram-negative, and methicillin-resistant infections in knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  José Cordero-Ampuero; Jaime Esteban; Eduardo García-Rey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Treatment of infected hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; C-H Flouzat-Lachianette; R Jalil; Sobrinho Uirassu Batista; I Guissou; A Poignard
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-03-02

9.  Prophylactic use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in primary total knee arthroplasty: Justified or not?

Authors:  Amit K Srivastav; Biren Nadkarni; Shekhar Srivastav; Vivek Mittal; Shekhar Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 10.  Rationale for one stage exchange of infected hip replacement using uncemented implants and antibiotic impregnated bone graft.

Authors:  Heinz Winkler
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.