Literature DB >> 11126729

Statistical analysis of the seasonal variation in demographic data.

J Fellman1, A W Eriksson.   

Abstract

There has been little agreement as to whether reproduction or similar demographic events occur seasonally and, especially, whether there is any universal seasonal pattern. One reason is that the seasonal pattern may vary in different populations and at different times. Another reason is that different statistical methods have been used. Every statistical model is based on certain assumed conditions and hence is designed to identify specific components of the seasonal pattern. Therefore, the statistical method applied should be chosen with due consideration. In this study we present, develop, and compare different statistical methods for the study of seasonal variation. Furthermore, we stress that the methods are applicable for the analysis of many kinds of demographic data. The first approaches in the literature were based on monthly frequencies, on the simple sine curve, and on the approximation that the months are of equal length. Later, "the population at risk" and the fact that the months have different lengths were considered. Under these later assumptions the targets of the statistical analyses are the rates. In this study we present and generalize the earlier models. Furthermore, we use trigonometric regression methods. The trigonometric regression model in its simplest form corresponds to the sine curve. We compare the regression methods with the earlier models and reanalyze some data. Our results show that models for rates eliminate the disturbing effects of the varying length of the months, including the effect of leap years, and of the seasonal pattern of the population at risk. Therefore, they give the purest analysis of the seasonal pattern of the demographic data in question, e.g., rates of general births, twin maternities, neural tube defects, and mortality. Our main finding is that the trigonometric regression methods are more flexible and easier to handle than the earlier methods, particularly when the data differ from the simple sine curve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11126729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Biol        ISSN: 0018-7143            Impact factor:   0.553


  5 in total

1.  A method to model season of birth as a surrogate environmental risk factor for disease.

Authors:  Jimmy Thomas Efird; Susan Searles Nielsen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Methodological challenges when estimating the effects of season and seasonal exposures on birth outcomes.

Authors:  Linn Beate Strand; Adrian G Barnett; Shilu Tong
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  The association of season and temperature with adverse pregnancy outcome in two German states, a time-series analysis.

Authors:  Jennyfer Wolf; Ben Armstrong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Autoregression as a means of assessing the strength of seasonality in a time series.

Authors:  Rahim Moineddin; Ross EG Upshur; Eric Crighton; Muhammad Mamdani
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2003-12-15

Review 5.  Risks and benefits of late onset hypogonadism treatment: an expert opinion.

Authors:  Giovanni Corona; Linda Vignozzi; Alessandra Sforza; Mario Maggi
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 5.400

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.