Literature DB >> 11125876

C- and Adelta-fibre mediated thermal perception: response to rate of temperature change using method of limits.

S T Palmer1, D J Martin, W M Steedman, J Ravey.   

Abstract

Studies investigating the effect of rate of temperature change on thermal thresholds have used a variety of different methods and threshold combinations, and many display incomplete reporting of statistical analyses. It has been suggested that C- and Adelta-fibre mediated thresholds differ in their reaction to different rates of temperature change. Ten healthy female volunteers (aged 18-26 years; mean 21 +/- S.D. 2.53) undertook cold sensation (CS), warm sensation (WS), cold pain (CP) and heat pain (HP) threshold determinations on the thenar eminence of the dominant hand. Rates of temperature change of 0.5, 1, 2.5 and 4 degrees C/s were used, with a modified method of limits. Adaptation temperature was 32 degrees C and thermode size 3 cm x 3 cm. Results showed a significant increase in WS, HP and CP thresholds with increased rates of temperature change (all p < 0.001), but no significant change for CS (p = 0.653). These results suggest that thresholds with a C-fibre component (WS, HP and CP) and those that are Adelta-fibre mediated (CS) behave differently. A traditional explanation of measurement artefact alone is insufficient in rationalizing these results, with additional factors potentially involved. Slow rates of temperature change were shown to reduce mean intra-individual differences in recorded threshold values, and also to abolish ceiling effects with HP threshold determinations. Clinically, therefore, using slow rates of temperature change with method of limits has a range of benefits over and above simply minimizing measurement artefact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11125876     DOI: 10.1080/08990220020002033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res        ISSN: 0899-0220            Impact factor:   1.111


  8 in total

1.  Threshold and rate sensitivity of low-threshold thermal nociception.

Authors:  Barry G Green; Carol Akirav
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Lower thermal sensation in normothermic and mildly hyperthermic older adults.

Authors:  Ryosuke Takeda; Daiki Imai; Akina Suzuki; Akemi Ota; Nooshin Naghavi; Yoshihiro Yamashina; Yoshikazu Hirasawa; Hisayo Yokoyama; Toshiaki Miyagawa; Kazunobu Okazaki
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  The fine tuning of pain thresholds: a sophisticated double alarm system.

Authors:  Léon Plaghki; Céline Decruynaere; Paul Van Dooren; Daniel Le Bars
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Thermal sensation during mild hyperthermia is modulated by acute postural change in humans.

Authors:  Ryosuke Takeda; Daiki Imai; Akina Suzuki; Akemi Ota; Nooshin Naghavi; Yoshihiro Yamashina; Yoshikazu Hirasawa; Hisayo Yokoyama; Toshiaki Miyagawa; Kazunobu Okazaki
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.787

5.  Predictors of postoperative pain and analgesic requirements following abdominal hysterectomy: an observational study.

Authors:  Marie T Aouad; Ghassan E Kanazi; Krystel Malek; Hani Tamim; Lama Zahreddine; Roland N Kaddoum
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Method-of-limits; Cold and warm perception thresholds at proximal and distal body regions.

Authors:  Victoria Heldestad Lilliesköld; Erik Nordh
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2018-07-05

7.  Preoperative widespread pain sensitization and chronic pain after hip and knee replacement: a cohort analysis.

Authors:  Vikki Wylde; Adrian Sayers; Erik Lenguerrand; Rachael Gooberman-Hill; Mark Pyke; Andrew D Beswick; Paul Dieppe; Ashley W Blom
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 7.926

8.  A test-retest reliability study of assessing small cutaneous fibers by measuring current perception threshold with pin electrodes.

Authors:  Weiwei Xia; Han Fu; Haiying Liu; Fanqi Meng; Kaifeng Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.