Literature DB >> 11125009

Dynamics of hippocampal ensemble activity realignment: time versus space.

A D Redish1, E S Rosenzweig, J D Bohanick, B L McNaughton, C A Barnes.   

Abstract

Whether hippocampal map realignment is coupled more strongly to position or time was studied in rats trained to shuttle on a linear track. The rats were required to run from a start box and to pause at a goal location at a fixed location relative to stable distal cues (room-aligned coordinate frame). The origin of each lap was varied by shifting the start box and track as a unit (box-aligned coordinate frame) along the direction of travel. As observed by Gothard et al. (1996a), on each lap the hippocampal activity realigned from a representation that was box-aligned to one that was room-aligned. We studied the dynamics of this transition using a measure of how well the moment-by-moment ensemble activity matched the expected activity given the location of the animal in each coordinate frame. The coherency ratio, defined as the ratio of the matches for the two coordinate systems, provides a quantitative measure of the ensemble activity alignment and was used to compare four possible descriptions of the realignment process. The elapsed time since leaving the box provided a better predictor of the occurrence of the transition than any of the three spatial parameters investigated, suggesting that the shift between coordinate systems is at least partially governed by a stochastic, time-dependent process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11125009      PMCID: PMC6772998     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  31 in total

1.  Three-dimensional spatial selectivity of hippocampal neurons during space flight.

Authors:  J J Knierim; B L McNaughton; G R Poe
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  A model of the neural basis of the rat's sense of direction.

Authors:  W E Skaggs; J J Knierim; H S Kudrimoti; B L McNaughton
Journal:  Adv Neural Inf Process Syst       Date:  1995

3.  Interactions between idiothetic cues and external landmarks in the control of place cells and head direction cells.

Authors:  J J Knierim; H S Kudrimoti; B L McNaughton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Path integration and cognitive mapping in a continuous attractor neural network model.

Authors:  A Samsonovich; B L McNaughton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Experience-dependent, asymmetric expansion of hippocampal place fields.

Authors:  M R Mehta; C A Barnes; B L McNaughton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-08-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Cognitive maps beyond the hippocampus.

Authors:  A D Redish; D S Touretzky
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.899

7.  Single unit activity in the rat hippocampus during a spatial memory task.

Authors:  J O'Keefe; A Speakman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Hippocampal unit activity during classical aversive and appetitive conditioning.

Authors:  M Segal; J F Disterhoft; J Olds
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-02-18       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Single-unit analysis of different hippocampal cell types during classical conditioning of rabbit nictitating membrane response.

Authors:  T W Berger; P C Rinaldi; D J Weisz; R F Thompson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Binding of hippocampal CA1 neural activity to multiple reference frames in a landmark-based navigation task.

Authors:  K M Gothard; W E Skaggs; K M Moore; B L McNaughton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Long-term potentiation and the ageing brain.

Authors:  C A Barnes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  On How the Dentate Gyrus Contributes to Memory Discrimination.

Authors:  Milenna Tamara van Dijk; André Antonio Fenton
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of the axon arbor of a CA3 pyramidal cell recorded and filled in vivo.

Authors:  Lucia Wittner; Darrell A Henze; László Záborszky; György Buzsáki
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 3.270

4.  Attention-like modulation of hippocampus place cell discharge.

Authors:  André A Fenton; William W Lytton; Jeremy M Barry; Pierre-Pascal Lenck-Santini; Larissa E Zinyuk; Stepan Kubík; Jan Bures; Bruno Poucet; Robert U Muller; Andrey V Olypher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Fragmentation of grid cell maps in a multicompartment environment.

Authors:  Dori Derdikman; Jonathan R Whitlock; Albert Tsao; Marianne Fyhn; Torkel Hafting; May-Britt Moser; Edvard I Moser
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-13       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 6.  Interacting networks of brain regions underlie human spatial navigation: a review and novel synthesis of the literature.

Authors:  Arne D Ekstrom; Derek J Huffman; Michael Starrett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Hippocampal network dynamics constrain the time lag between pyramidal cells across modified environments.

Authors:  Kamran Diba; György Buzsáki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Dynamics of hippocampal spatial representation in echolocating bats.

Authors:  Nachum Ulanovsky; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.899

9.  Sequence reactivation in the hippocampus is impaired in aged rats.

Authors:  Jason L Gerrard; Sara N Burke; Bruce L McNaughton; Carol A Barnes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Dynamic grouping of hippocampal neural activity during cognitive control of two spatial frames.

Authors:  Eduard Kelemen; André A Fenton
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.