Literature DB >> 11124874

Structural complexity of territories: preference, use of space and defence in commensal house mice, Mus domesticus.

.   

Abstract

Previous studies suggest the physical structure of a habitat has profound effects on intraspecific competition and spacing behaviour among small mammals. We compared habitat preferences and the exploratory behaviour and aggressive territorial defence of male house mice in three types of enclosure differing only in their degree of structural complexity. Each enclosure contained a nestbox placed in one corner, a central food hopper and 10 house bricks. The bricks were either placed around the outer walls (open enclosures), lined up across the middle (wall enclosures) or scattered separately across the floor (complex enclosures). In pairwise choice tests, mice showed a strong preference for wall or complex enclosures over open enclosures but no preference between wall and complex enclosures. They were more active throughout the enclosure with complex structuring and stayed near the side walls in open enclosures. Residents in open enclosures initially showed a lower rate of attack and duration of pursuit when faced with an intruder but not when faced with a second intruder. In complex enclosures, nearly all encounters ended because the residents continued pursuit but lost track of the intruder. This occurred in only half of intruder pursuits in open and wall enclosures. Our results suggest that mice prefer areas containing physical structure because this provides a degree of protection from predators but territories with complex physical structuring appear to be much more difficult to defend. Complex areas may thus support a higher density of mice than open areas or those with more simply aligned physical structuring. Copyright 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 11124874     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  15 in total

1.  How does habitat complexity affect ant foraging success? A test using functional measures on three continents.

Authors:  H Gibb; C L Parr
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Colony formation of C57BL/6J mice in visible burrow system: identification of eusocial behaviors in a background strain for genetic animal models of autism.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Arakawa; D Caroline Blanchard; Robert J Blanchard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Stress in groups: Lessons from non-traditional rodent species and housing models.

Authors:  Annaliese K Beery; Melissa M Holmes; Won Lee; James P Curley
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Commensal ecology, urban landscapes, and their influence on the genetic characteristics of city-dwelling Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus).

Authors:  L C Gardner-Santana; D E Norris; C M Fornadel; E R Hinson; S L Klein; G E Glass
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Ucn3 and CRF-R2 in the medial amygdala regulate complex social dynamics.

Authors:  Yair Shemesh; Oren Forkosh; Mathias Mahn; Sergey Anpilov; Yehezkel Sztainberg; Sharon Manashirov; Tamar Shlapobersky; Evan Elliott; Laure Tabouy; Gili Ezra; Elaine S Adler; Yair J Ben-Efraim; Shosh Gil; Yael Kuperman; Sharon Haramati; Julien Dine; Matthias Eder; Jan M Deussing; Elad Schneidman; Ofer Yizhar; Alon Chen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  A selfish genetic element influencing longevity correlates with reactive behavioural traits in female house mice (Mus domesticus).

Authors:  Yannick Auclair; Barbara König; Anna K Lindholm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Induction of prolonged natural lifespans in mice exposed to acoustic environmental enrichment.

Authors:  Yuichi Yamashita; Norie Kawai; Osamu Ueno; Yui Matsumoto; Tsutomu Oohashi; Manabu Honda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A Social Network Approach Reveals Associations between Mouse Social Dominance and Brain Gene Expression.

Authors:  Nina So; Becca Franks; Sean Lim; James P Curley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mouse Social Network Dynamics and Community Structure are Associated with Plasticity-Related Brain Gene Expression.

Authors:  Cait M Williamson; Becca Franks; James P Curley
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 10.  Integrating resource defence theory with a neural nonapeptide pathway to explain territory-based mating systems.

Authors:  Ronald G Oldfield; Rayna M Harris; Hans A Hofmann
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 3.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.