Literature DB >> 11123838

Makers of the early Aurignacian of Europe.

S E Churchill1, F H Smith.   

Abstract

Despite intensive study and a number of remarkable discoveries in the last two decades of the 20th century, our understanding of the cultural and biological processes that resulted in the emergence of the Upper Paleolithic and the establishment of modern humans in Interpleniglacial Europe remains far from complete. There is active debate concerning the timing and location of the origins of the Aurignacian, the nature of the origins of Initial Upper Paleolithic industries (whether by autochthonous development or through acculturation by Aurignacian peoples), the timing of the appearance of early modern humans and the disappearance of the Neandertals, and the relationship of archeologically defined cultures to these different types of hominids. Frustrating our attempts to address these latter two questions is a general paucity of taxonomically diagnostic human fossil material from early Upper Paleolithic contexts. We undertake here a review of the human fossil record of Interpleniglacial Europe, and its archeological and chronological context, to clarify to the extent possible the nature of the relationship between hominid groups and the earliest Upper Paleolithic artifact industries, particularly the early Aurignacian. Although substantial difficulties involved in interpreting the fossil, archeological, and geochronological records of this time period prohibit making any definitive statements, a number of observations are suggested by the current data: 1) the Middle Paleolithic of Europe appears to have been made exclusively by Neandertals; 2) Initial Upper Paleolithic industries (with the exception of the Bachokirian) appear to have their roots in the late Middle Paleolithic industries of their respective regions; 3) all of the human fossils yet recovered from Initial Upper Paleolithic (except the Bachokirian) contexts for which any diagnostic morphology is present have their greatest morphological affinities with Neandertals and not early modern humans; 4) modern humans were almost certainly established in Europe by ca. 32 ky BP, with a strong possibility that they were there by ca. 36 ky BP. Claims for an appearance before 36 ky BP cannot be substantiated with currently available evidence; 5) the hypothesis that modern humans are uniquely associated with the Aurignacian cannot yet be refuted. Aurignacian-associated human fossils (including those from the Bachokirian) for which any diagnostic morphology is present have their greatest affinities with early modern Europeans and not Neandertals; and 6) Neandertals and modern humans coexisted in Europe for at least 2,000-4,000 years, and perhaps for 8,000-10,000 years or longer. The overall picture is one of an extended period of cultural contact, involving some degree of genetic exchange, between Neandertals and early modern Europeans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11123838     DOI: 10.1002/1096-8644(2000)43:31+<61::aid-ajpa4>3.0.co;2-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  20 in total

1.  Neanderthal symbolism and ornament manufacture: the bursting of a bubble?

Authors:  Paul Mellars
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A female figurine from the basal Aurignacian of Hohle Fels Cave in southwestern Germany.

Authors:  Nicholas J Conard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Palaeoproteomic evidence identifies archaic hominins associated with the Châtelperronian at the Grotte du Renne.

Authors:  Frido Welker; Mateja Hajdinjak; Sahra Talamo; Klervia Jaouen; Michael Dannemann; Francine David; Michèle Julien; Matthias Meyer; Janet Kelso; Ian Barnes; Selina Brace; Pepijn Kamminga; Roman Fischer; Benedikt M Kessler; John R Stewart; Svante Pääbo; Matthew J Collins; Jean-Jacques Hublin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Reciprocal evolution of the cerebellum and neocortex in fossil humans.

Authors:  Anne H Weaver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Early dispersal of modern humans in Europe and implications for Neanderthal behaviour.

Authors:  Stefano Benazzi; Katerina Douka; Cinzia Fornai; Catherine C Bauer; Ottmar Kullmer; Jiří Svoboda; Ildikó Pap; Francesco Mallegni; Priscilla Bayle; Michael Coquerelle; Silvana Condemi; Annamaria Ronchitelli; Katerina Harvati; Gerhard W Weber
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Early modern humans from the Pestera Muierii, Baia de Fier, Romania.

Authors:  Andrei Soficaru; Adrian Dobos; Erik Trinkaus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The Neandertal type site revisited: interdisciplinary investigations of skeletal remains from the Neander Valley, Germany.

Authors:  Ralf W Schmitz; David Serre; Georges Bonani; Susanne Feine; Felix Hillgruber; Heike Krainitzki; Svante Pääbo; Fred H Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Testing the hypothesis of fire use for ecosystem management by neanderthal and upper palaeolithic modern human populations.

Authors:  Anne-Laure Daniau; Francesco d'Errico; Maria Fernanda Sánchez Goñi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Out of Africa: modern human origins special feature: the spread of modern humans in Europe.

Authors:  John F Hoffecker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Radiocarbon dates from the Grotte du Renne and Saint-Césaire support a Neandertal origin for the Châtelperronian.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Hublin; Sahra Talamo; Michèle Julien; Francine David; Nelly Connet; Pierre Bodu; Bernard Vandermeersch; Michael P Richards
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.