Literature DB >> 11123561

Use of focus groups to assess the educational needs of the primary care physician for the management of asthma.

P Davis1, P Man, A Cave, S McBennett, D Cook.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the educational needs of primary care physicians, in the management of patients with asthma.
DESIGN: Focus group discussions with physicians, pharmacists, respiratory therapists and patients.
SETTING: Metropolitan Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Out of an original mail request to 100 potential recruits, 52 people attended the focus group sessions. These included physicians, pharmacists, respiratory therapists, adult patients and paediatric patients accompanied by their parents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Consensus of the specific group being interviewed using facilitator-mediated responses, to identify problems in the care of asthma patients and appropriate educational methods to improve the situation.
RESULTS: Both diagnostic and treatment concerns were identified by the primary care physicians and others in the study. Confusion with infection was the most common diagnostic problem. Major treatment problems involved confusion about aspects of management strategy and a lack of communication between physicians, patients and other members of the health care team. Poor patient compliance and patients changing doctors frequently were also of major concern. There were inconsistencies in the treatment of asthma between physicians. While most physicians felt that they were up-to-date in management, Asthma Control Guidelines were seldom followed.
CONCLUSIONS: There is an urgent need for continuing medical education, not only in management but also in communication with patients and with other members of the health care team. The data permit the development of an ongoing educational programme which is practical and designed to deal with the issues identified in this survey.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11123561     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00685.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  7 in total

1.  Lay experiences and concerns with asthma in an urban Hispanic community.

Authors:  Laurene Tumiel-Berhalter; Luis E Zayas
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  Patient and provider perspectives on uptake of a shared decision making intervention for asthma in primary care practices.

Authors:  Madelyn Welch; Thomas Ludden; Kathleen Mottus; Paul Bray; Lori Hendrickson; Jennifer Rees; Jacqueline Halladay; Hazel Tapp
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.515

3.  Asthma education: different viewpoints elicited by qualitative and quantitative methods.

Authors:  Scott A Damon; Richard R Tardif
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.515

4.  Window to the Unknown: Using Storytelling to Identify Learning Needs for the Intrinsic Competencies Within an Online Needs Assessment.

Authors:  Eric K Tseng; David Jo; Andrew W Shih; Kerstin De Wit; Teresa M Chan
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2019-01-06

5.  Prenatal screening for substance use and violence: findings from physician focus groups.

Authors:  Polly Taylor; Jeanette Zaichkin; Diane Pilkey; Judith Leconte; Bryan K Johnson; Anne C Peterson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-12-05

6.  "What is the actual goal of the pathway?": examining emergency department physician and nurse perspectives on the implementation of a pediatric concussion pathway using the theoretical domains framework.

Authors:  Anh Ly; Roger Zemek; Bruce Wright; Jennifer Zwicker; Kathryn Schneider; Angelo Mikrogianakis; Alf Conradi; David Johnson; Brenda Clark; Karen Barlow; Joseph Burey; Ash Kolstad; Keith Owen Yeates
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  What types of dissemination of information occurred between researchers, providers and clinical staff while implementing an asthma shared decision-making intervention: a directed content analysis.

Authors:  Thomas Ludden; Lindsay Shade; Madelyn Welch; Jacqueline Halladay; Katrina E Donahue; Tamera Coyne-Beasley; Paul Bray; Hazel Tapp
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-03-08       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.