Literature DB >> 11123234

Minimal protection of the liver by ischemic preconditioning in pigs.

R Schulz1, M K Walz, M Behrends, T Neumann, G Gerken, G Heusch.   

Abstract

Ischemic preconditioning (IP) protects the rat liver. In pigs, in which hepatic tolerance to ischemia is similar to that in humans, information on IP is lacking. Therefore, in enflurane-anesthetized pigs, hepatic vessels were occluded for 120 min (protocol 1) or 200 min (protocol 2) without (control) and with IP (3 times 10 min ischemia-reperfusion each). In protocol 1, cumulative bile flow (CBF) during reperfusion was greater in IP (47.3 +/- 5.2 ml/8 h) than in control (17.1 +/- 7.8 ml/8 h, P < 0.05). ATP content tended to recover toward normal during reperfusion in IP, whereas it remained at ischemic levels in control. Serum enzyme concentrations increased similarly during reperfusion, and <1% hepatocytes were necrotic or stained terminal deosynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling-positive in control and IP groups. In protocol 2, no differences in CBF, ATP, or serum enzyme concentrations during reperfusion were measured between control and IP groups, except for a somewhat reduced lactate dehydrogenase in IP. The number of necrotic or terminal deosynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling-positive hepatocytes tended to be greater in the IP than the control group. Thus IP provides some functional protection against reversible ischemia but no protection during prolonged ischemia in pigs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11123234     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.2001.280.1.H198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  6 in total

1.  Vascular clamping in liver surgery: physiology, indications and techniques.

Authors:  Elie K Chouillard; Andrew A Gumbs; Daniel Cherqui
Journal:  Ann Surg Innov Res       Date:  2010-03-26

Review 2.  Ischemia/reperfusion injury in liver resection: a review of preconditioning methods.

Authors:  Kassiani Theodoraki; Aliki Tympa; Iosifina Karmaniolou; Athanassia Tsaroucha; Nikolaos Arkadopoulos; Vassilios Smyrniotis
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Protective effects of ischemic preconditioning and application of lipoic acid prior to 90 min of hepatic ischemia in a rat model.

Authors:  Friedrich Duenschede; Kirsten Erbes; Nina Riegler; Patrick Ewald; Achim Kircher; Stefanie Westermann; Arno Schad; Imke Miesmer; Simon Albrecht-Schöck; Ines Gockel; Alexandra K Kiemer; Theodor Junginger
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha mediates protective effects of ischemic preconditioning on ECV-304 endothelial cells.

Authors:  Liu-Bin Shi; Jian-Hua Huang; Bao-San Han
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Ischemic postconditioning decreases iNOS gene expression but ischemic preconditioning ameliorates histological injury in a swine model of extended liver resection.

Authors:  Elissaios Kontis; Eirini Pantiora; Aikaterini Melemeni; Athanasia Tsaroucha; Eleni Karvouni; Andreas Polydorou; Antonios Vezakis; Georgios P Fragulidis
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-01-31

6.  Effects of ischemic preconditioning in a pig model of large-for-size liver transplantation.

Authors:  Antonio José Gonçalves Leal; Ana Cristina Aoun Tannuri; Alessandro Rodrigo Belon; Raimundo Renato Nunes Guimarães; Maria Cecília Mendonça Coelho; Josiane de Oliveira Gonçalves; Suellen Serafini; Evandro Sobroza de Melo; Uenis Tannuri
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.365

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.